Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
There are 59 offshore oil rigs working in the US. If your price is correct, that is 340% more being invested in the Alberta oil sands than all US operating offshore drill rigs in operation. Or more than 2/3's the rest of the world's offshore drill rigs being invested in one area.

LOL. Those are just for the rigs, not the drillling and infrastructure needed to move the product. The oil industry involves huge capital costs. The Alberta oil sands project investment is over an extended period of time up thru 2015 and much of the money has yet to be committed. The Alaska pipeline alone cost $8 billion to construct and that was 30 years ago so in today's dollars the costs are much higher.

Can you name a single area in the world of comparable size getting more?

There is no doubt that the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia has had much more money invested in it than Alberta's oilsand project. If you want to look at some big numbers, check out what the Saudis are doing.

68 posted on 01/24/2008 2:39:00 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
There is no doubt that the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia has had much more money invested in it than Alberta's oilsand project.

$150 Billion in a decade? I would say there is considerable doubt.

If you want to look at some big numbers, check out what the Saudis are doing.

That link describes plans to spend a total of $29 billion. Why is that supposed to be more impressive than $150 billion? It is less than 20% of the Alberta projects.

69 posted on 01/24/2008 2:50:30 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson