Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forkinsocket
Saddam’s being interrogated by the FBI, CIA and FDIC and he knows that we haven’t found stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons (maybe a leftover shell or three from the Iran-Iraq war or gassing the Kurds, but no stockpiles). If he did have them or their precursors and he hid them, he has no reason to admit that. He still had hopes (delusions?) that we would have to put him back in power because “he was the only one who could control Iraq”. If he had them and admitted it or if he never had them but claimed that he did hide them, he knew he would never get back into power. If he claims that he didn’t have them and we had no evidence that he did, he still thought he had a chance of not getting his neck stretched. Thus his claims provide no useful information.
7 posted on 01/25/2008 6:20:48 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Saddam....The other Baghdad Bob.


8 posted on 01/25/2008 6:28:26 AM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson