Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpanther

>>I think sex ed should be taught at home, if there’s not a parent or there are ignorant parents, then perhaps a qualfied medical person can do it. I think the point made about NEA types that are failing to teach kids math and are hellbent on socializing kids, aren’t to be trusted with sex ed for especially young kids!<<

I would personally be will to put everything aside in public schools until/unless they have great programs in math,science, english, history and computers -those should come ahead of everything else including football.

But... if we are gonna spend hundreds of millions of dollars on sex ed, it need to be useful sex ed. and that means explaining risks and how to reduce those risks. and that means teaching about barriers.


121 posted on 01/30/2008 6:39:26 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

the problem is we’re spending all that money and they’re teaching kids too young to know what’s even going on, as well as every “sexual orientation” out there and they’re fighting to have kids as youg as 12 go to abortion clinics WITHOUT parental consent!


123 posted on 01/30/2008 10:54:04 AM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson