To: Tax-chick
I think the use of the term erotic, is meant to show that it is erotic to show these things to children. Just as porn would be. You don’t feed curiosity in young pubescent children, because they are yet undeveloped and unable to handle sexual relationships, physically, mentally, and emotionally. And yes, these images would be erotic to most kids.
93 posted on
01/28/2008 4:53:21 PM PST by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican! GoHunter.08)
To: gidget7; Mrs. Don-o
that it is erotic to show these things to children.Maybe. It's not erotic to me ... I'm not turned on by the thought of putting on a condom for anal sex, nor the depiction. (My view of the male anatomy is influenced by many, many years of changing little boys' diapers ...). Teenage boys, I'm told, find just about anything erotic. Girls are less likely to; they're interested in relationship (even if it's an instrumental relationship: I give you sex, you give me status) and can probably tell that they're basically being used as toilets.
That's what I meant by saying they're using "erotic" where they really mean "perverted."
95 posted on
01/28/2008 5:45:00 PM PST by
Tax-chick
("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson