Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
I think the use of the term erotic, is meant to show that it is erotic to show these things to children. Just as porn would be. You don’t feed curiosity in young pubescent children, because they are yet undeveloped and unable to handle sexual relationships, physically, mentally, and emotionally. And yes, these images would be erotic to most kids.
93 posted on 01/28/2008 4:53:21 PM PST by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican! GoHunter.08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: gidget7; Mrs. Don-o
that it is erotic to show these things to children.

Maybe. It's not erotic to me ... I'm not turned on by the thought of putting on a condom for anal sex, nor the depiction. (My view of the male anatomy is influenced by many, many years of changing little boys' diapers ...). Teenage boys, I'm told, find just about anything erotic. Girls are less likely to; they're interested in relationship (even if it's an instrumental relationship: I give you sex, you give me status) and can probably tell that they're basically being used as toilets.

That's what I meant by saying they're using "erotic" where they really mean "perverted."

95 posted on 01/28/2008 5:45:00 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson