Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

No.
Read post five again and again.
I think the amendment was misinterpreted at one point when it was not a significant problem and has grown way out of proportion since creating a problem.
It does not need a new amendment.
It just needs to be read correctly.
If you won’t see that then what can anyone say?


32 posted on 01/26/2008 12:07:59 PM PST by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: smoketree

It really does not matter how you or I read the 14th but rather how it is read by the SCOTUS.

However, the reality of the situation is that both parties are pandering to the Hispanic Vote and thus neither party will move to take action to repeal the 14th.


35 posted on 01/26/2008 12:13:35 PM PST by trumandogz (Whichever Way the Wind Blows Willard 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson