Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Millions fail to claim credit as low-income taxpayers
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | January 25, 2008 | EILEEN PUTMAN ap

Posted on 01/26/2008 9:10:50 AM PST by mdittmar

WASHINGTON -- The IRS is making a big push this year to make sure certain taxpayers know they can take the earned income tax credit, a benefit for lower income workers and working families that goes unclaimed by up to 25 percent of those who are eligible.

The EITC is intended to offset a portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes, thus boosting take-home income in low-wage jobs and providing an incentive to work. It's a "refundable" credit, meaning that after it is figured against your tax liability, the IRS sends you any money you're due.

For 2007 tax returns, the maximum credit is worth up to $4,716 for people with two or more qualifying children, though it's also available to some taxpayers without children.

"For families eligible for the maximum it's almost a quarter of their income," said David Williams, IRS director of Electronic Tax Administration and Refundable Credits. "That is such a significant amount of money. It can mean so much for a family."

But the rules and qualifications can be confusing. People overlook the credit because they believe it's too complicated, they don't have children or their income is so low they don't have a legal obligation to file taxes. Many aren't native English speakers.

As many as 5 million people are probably eligible for the credit but are not taking it, the IRS says.

To reach out to them, the IRS has "EITC Awareness Day" on Jan. 31 -- about the time people get their W-2 forms from employers and start thinking about income taxes. The agency also works with 12,000 volunteer tax preparation sites for people who need help with this and other benefits.

The credit is calculated on IRS worksheets, available in English and Spanish. There is also an English-Spanish "EITC Assistant" tool on the IRS Web site at www.irs.gov. Many EITC filers can file free online using the IRS Free File partners, providing they access those partners from the IRS Web site. The agency is also reaching out to Native Americans, people with disabilities and those in rural areas who may be eligible for the credit.

Congress originally approved the tax credit legislation in 1975. For tax year 2005, more than 22 million taxpayers received over $41 billion through the EITC credit, an average credit of $1,797, the IRS said. For tax year 2006, 22.4 million taxpayers received $43.7 billion as of last November. But only about 75 percent of those eligible claim this benefit, the agency says.

Most who claim the credit use a paid tax preparer. The IRS says taxpayers should avoid preparers who offer upfront to qualify them for EITC or ask them to sign a blank 1040. They should also avoid preparers who charge high fees for refund anticipation loans, a short-term advance of quick cash using the expected refund as collateral. Those who can't afford a paid preparer should use volunteer tax prep sites run by community organizations, the IRS says.

To get the earned income tax credit, you must file a tax return, even if you didn't earn enough money to be obligated to file.

If you had less than $37,783 ($39,783 for married filing jointly) in income in 2007 and had two or more qualifying children, you are eligible for the credit. People with no qualifying child can still be eligible for a credit of up to $428 if their income was less than $12,590 ($14,590 for joint filers). Those with one qualifying child and income under $33,241 ($35,241 for joint filers) are also eligible.

What's a qualifying child? There are three tests: the child's relationship to you, age and residency. A qualifying child can be a son, daughter, stepchild, foster or adopted child, or descendant of any of them; brother, sister, half brother or sister, stepbrother, stepsister or their descendant. The child must have been under 19 at the end of 2007 or a full-time student under age 24. Someone permanently and totally disabled also qualifies, regardless of age. The child must have lived with you in the United States for more than half the year.

People claiming the EITC, and their qualifying children, must have valid Social Security numbers.

It's possible some of those eligible for the credit don't claim it because they have illegal immigrants in the household and fear the IRS will share their information with immigration authorities. The IRS says it doesn't do that.

"We divulge that information to no one," Williams said. "We would not be divulging Social Security numbers or taxpayer identification numbers to other third parties."

Another reason people may hold back from filing for the credit is fear that the refundable money may adversely affect welfare benefits. But in most cases, EITC payments are not used to determine eligibility for Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, food stamps, low-income housing or most Temporary Assistance for Needy Families payments.

For more information, see Publication 596, "Earned Income Credit."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; irs; taxcode; workingpoor
It's possible some of those eligible for the credit don't claim it because they have illegal immigrants in the household and fear the IRS will share their information with immigration authorities. The IRS says it doesn't do that.

"We divulge that information to no one," Williams said. "We would not be divulging Social Security numbers or taxpayer identification numbers to other third parties."

1 posted on 01/26/2008 9:10:53 AM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar; All
And the PI also gives out info for tax help,who tops the list?
TAX HELP Here are some places in King County where you can get free tax help in coming weeks: ACORN Working Families Prosperity Centers
2 posted on 01/26/2008 9:17:16 AM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Money taken from the productive to buy the vote of the non-productive. Ain’t America great!


3 posted on 01/26/2008 9:48:32 AM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

“We divulge that information to no one,” Williams said.
___________________________
Williams = not the brightest bulb in the box.


4 posted on 01/26/2008 10:29:19 AM PST by cowdog77 (Circle the Wagons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
There is also an English-Spanish "EITC Assistant" tool on the IRS Web site at www.irs.gov. The agency is also reaching out to Native Americans, people with disabilities and those in rural areas who may be eligible for the credit

They are taking a page from the playbook of the People's Republic of Massachusetts. I switch to CDs during the commercials on talk radio - not just out of boredom, but because of the constant advertisements for food stamps. Yes, Mass. is using taxpayer dollars to encourage people to sign up for welfare.

Insane.
5 posted on 01/26/2008 10:30:38 AM PST by LostInBayport ("Anyone whose tax bill goes up feels like it's an increase." - Mass. Governor Deval Patrick, 2/28/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I knew a woman who worked as a cleaning woman in govt. buildings, making about $13,000 a year. She went for a decade taking care of two grandsons, paying thousands upon thousands in taxes that she didn’t owe, because she didn’t know she could claim grandchildren as dependents. And why SHOULD a hard-working, poor woman be expected to know all her rights amid 50,000 pages of tax law?

I thought of that woman every time I beheld and gross, bloated image of Thomas P. “Baby-Murderer” O’Neill.


6 posted on 01/26/2008 10:30:39 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I can’t be the only one who is sickened by the term “working families”. It’s so ridiculous to think that those who earn $8 per hour somehow work harder than those who make $90k per year.


7 posted on 01/26/2008 10:32:41 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

Insane.

No, not really. Very sane actually if you hold power by having a certain % of people who are dependent on you.


8 posted on 01/26/2008 10:34:00 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I hope she went back and claimed amended tax returns as far back as she could.


9 posted on 01/26/2008 10:34:53 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

Just getting the EIC that “the rich” don’t want! J/K


10 posted on 01/26/2008 10:36:11 AM PST by Rush4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

gnip...


11 posted on 01/26/2008 10:45:53 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Why don't the call it what it is: Earned Income Credit REDISTRIBUTION.
12 posted on 01/26/2008 10:48:40 AM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

But the rules and qualifications can be confusing

Well, that and the fact that every citizen has to be an accountant for the federal government for all his/her economic activity..

13 posted on 01/26/2008 11:47:31 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
"Working families" has become a liberal and Democrat keyword over the past several elections. It basically means everyone who isn't "rich" and is jealous of those who are. It reeks of class warfare. It especially means union families and those who receive government benefits and subsidies.

I happened to see the TV show "peoples' court" yesterday. There was a woman trying to get a section 8 apartment. She stated that she only had to pay $50 rent, while the government paid $900 a month. She had a job, which she said she resented having to get, and was successfully paying rent of $350 on her old apartment, but as soon as she got her section 8, she was going to quit her job.

There's a working family for you. The Democrats play heavily to this crowd, promising more and more free living, taking things from the "rich".

14 posted on 01/26/2008 12:05:08 PM PST by Sender (I've been chicken franchised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sender

You hit the nail on the head. It’s a not so veiled attempt to incite class hatred and plays on the stupidity of the democrat’s base.


15 posted on 01/26/2008 4:02:46 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sender

You hit the nail on the head. It’s a not so veiled attempt to incite class hatred and plays on the stupidity of the democrats’ base.


16 posted on 01/26/2008 4:03:09 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The fact that the IRS has to make a big push to inform low income tax payers of a credit that they qualify for is why a lot of these people are low income earners in the first place.


17 posted on 01/26/2008 5:19:16 PM PST by eastcobb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

She was able to claim back three years, which yielded a refund of $3000. She had been raising the boys herself for more than TEN years, however. I still think of the fat, gross, obnoxious, self-satisfied, baby-killer New Dealer “Catholic” Thomas P. “Jabba the Hut” O’Neill whenever the subject of the impenetrable tax code comes up.


18 posted on 01/26/2008 11:43:21 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eastcobb

Best post I’ve read in a long time! You can lead a brainless horse to water.......


19 posted on 01/27/2008 8:20:37 AM PST by Panzerfaust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson