Two "intelligent" political idiots who love camera attention....
1 posted on
01/26/2008 10:58:22 PM PST by
robo_tek
To: robo_tek
CNN knows the Clintons own these two. It is hysterical they are made to muzzle them.
To: robo_tek
I don’t see how this helps Obama.
3 posted on
01/26/2008 11:04:39 PM PST by
littlehouse36
(Better a RINO than the Beast; It's McRomniani for me.)
To: robo_tek
CNN has told top Dem strategists James Carville, Paul Begala, and Robert Zimmerman -- who are CNN mainstays but are all Hillary supporters -- that they will not be doing any more political analysis on the network until the Democratic primary has reached a conclusion.
Anyone see the hypocrisy in this?
These two Democrat partisans are only being banned until the Democrat primary is settled, rather than the entire 2008 election.
Apparently pimping for one Democrat over another during the Democrat primary is off-limits on CNN, but not pimping for Democrats over Republicans in the general election.
4 posted on
01/26/2008 11:06:49 PM PST by
counterpunch
(Mike Huckabee — The Religious Wrong)
To: robo_tek
Carville is back on Hillary’s payroll from what I hear. How can he act as an analyst without bias?
Bagala may be in the same boat.
I’m just surprised CNN will act on this matter. They’ve been in bed with the Clinton’s more times than any other broad has been.
5 posted on
01/26/2008 11:15:08 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
To: robo_tek
I may have to crossover for Obama right now. If he can shut Carville up for four years, he could get my vote. Hubby says, “He is showing himself to be a formiddable candidate.” This is high praise.
8 posted on
01/26/2008 11:24:11 PM PST by
petitfour
To: robo_tek
Two "intelligent" political idiots who love camera attention.... Yeah, these two assho!es get plenty of praise from the MSM and I've often wondered why. Krintong got 43% of the vote in '92 and 48% in '96, hardly what could be deemed overwhelming.
Seems to me no Perot, no Clinton...and frankly I think the same holds true this time around. Hillary loses without third-party candidate help.
10 posted on
01/26/2008 11:33:10 PM PST by
blake6900
(YOUR AD HERE)
To: robo_tek
How I wish, FNC would do the same for Geraldo “The Fake”.
14 posted on
01/27/2008 1:07:44 AM PST by
Capt_Hank
(btu's...kcal's...to kJ's, but my activation energy is still high.)
To: robo_tek
If Edwards had made the same request, CNN would have laughed in his face. But CNN will do whatever Obama wants because Obama is black, and to deny his request - - any request - - would be racist.
To: robo_tek
Whatever.
As the wheels come off the economy the truth will become obvious.
Romney is our anointed savior.
18 posted on
01/27/2008 4:41:52 AM PST by
Vet_6780
("I see debt people")
To: robo_tek
If Hillary gets the nod will they still be banned, or will they be brought back to trash the Republican candidate? Rhetorical question of course.
19 posted on
01/27/2008 5:00:02 AM PST by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: robo_tek
If there is a reason to ban them now, why does it stop after the primaries are over? Yea, I know why.
20 posted on
01/27/2008 5:23:09 AM PST by
SampleMan
(We are a free an industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: robo_tek
YAY! Props to the Obama people who brought this about!
25 posted on
01/27/2008 12:01:41 PM PST by
Palladin
(Rudy on abortion: "I believe in a woman's right to choose.")
To: robo_tek
If CNN bans Carville and Begalla temporarily, should FOX not ban or limit appearances of Geraldo who is endorsing McCain?
To: robo_tek
Wow, night of the long knives at CNN toward the Clintons.
30 posted on
01/27/2008 1:53:51 PM PST by
mware
(Americans in arm chairs doing the work of the media.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson