It’s Clinton’s fault!
I wonder if the editors of the Times are aware of the proverb: A broken clock is right twice a day.
Of course, had Bush 41 or Bubba 42 taken out Saddam, then the Nutty Left would have nothing to argue against GWB.
Thugs around the world are going to learn this lesson: when a Democrat is in the White House, it’s party time. When a Republican is President, watch your step.
Result: more and more open campaigning for the Democrats by thugs and dictators.
*They aren't 'anti-war', they are anti-American. They only oppose wars, in which America is involved. They never, ever, ever protest any other war. They never, ever, ever protest the savagery are barbarity of the terrorists. We haven't come up with a better word to describe the Pinkos, defeatists, anti-Americans yet.
You need lessons on how to post.
Announcements Notifications of Activism events, FR business
Breaking News - Not every story is breaking news. Breaking news should be news that affects most of us. There are some exceptions. If there is a hot current event happening, check breaking news. Most likely, it's there already, please check first, then use our search function.
Editorial - Editorials are opinions. Some vanities, if well written and thought out can be considered editorial material.
Extended News - Extended news is for stories which have been posted previously and have updated or newer information.
Free Republic - This category is reserved for Free Republic business.
Front Page News - Front page is for stories which are not breaking news, but would be found on the front page of a newspaper.
Sorry, but that's an ahistorical statement.
When the US threatened Saddam, we had just come off finishing off the Taliban. GWB was taken seriously.
The PROBLEM, in a nutshell, was Chirac and the French. The French, and their actions in the UN security council, were seen as a life preserver to Saddam, and gave him hope that he could wait out GWB's political offensive and survive.
The actions of the French made the US "surounding Iraq" tactic fail to dislodge Saddam, and made the invasion inevitable.
Let the shame lay where it deserves.
So how does one demonstrate toughness? This means we should have finished Saddam off in the early 90s.
Saddam really was a “perfect enemy”. That is, he went out of his way to do everything he could to guarantee American action. Almost by the numbers. He broke every international rule he could, clearing the path for the US. He even humiliated his international supporters, who while not liking him, dislike the US more.
Compare him to Iran. While also full of bluff and bluster, arrogance and belligerence, Iran knows when to back down, such as when Reagan was elected. Iran knows that you can only taunt the tiger so much before you become lunch.