Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Amen. In the past we threatened use of force too often without using it.
1 posted on 01/27/2008 2:49:34 PM PST by AlternateEgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AlternateEgo

It’s Clinton’s fault!


2 posted on 01/27/2008 2:51:31 PM PST by stayathomemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo
"...But America needs to heed the underlying message: Dictators won't respond to threats they don't take seriously. Had the US record reflected greater toughness, the war itself might have been averted."

I wonder if the editors of the Times are aware of the proverb: A broken clock is right twice a day.

Of course, had Bush 41 or Bubba 42 taken out Saddam, then the Nutty Left would have nothing to argue against GWB.

3 posted on 01/27/2008 2:55:48 PM PST by JRios1968 (Don't mess with tigers, for you are crunchy and chewy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo

Thugs around the world are going to learn this lesson: when a Democrat is in the White House, it’s party time. When a Republican is President, watch your step.

Result: more and more open campaigning for the Democrats by thugs and dictators.


4 posted on 01/27/2008 2:57:07 PM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo
Let's expand on this point. The only way to avoid the Iraq War was for the West to be united, for the public in the West to be united. So, once again the 'anti-war'* people's actions, lead not to peace, but to war.

*They aren't 'anti-war', they are anti-American. They only oppose wars, in which America is involved. They never, ever, ever protest any other war. They never, ever, ever protest the savagery are barbarity of the terrorists. We haven't come up with a better word to describe the Pinkos, defeatists, anti-Americans yet.

6 posted on 01/27/2008 2:59:22 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Just laugh at them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo

You need lessons on how to post.


8 posted on 01/27/2008 3:07:19 PM PST by bmwcyle (McCain Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo
Activism/Chapters - Activism, protests, news and business of Free Republic Chapters. Freep this poll should be placed in vanity. General news stories about activism should be place in news. After action reports from Freeps are allowed here.

Announcements – Notifications of Activism events, FR business

Breaking News - Not every story is breaking news. Breaking news should be news that affects most of us. There are some exceptions. If there is a hot current event happening, check breaking news. Most likely, it's there already, please check first, then use our search function.

Editorial - Editorials are opinions. Some vanities, if well written and thought out can be considered editorial material.

Extended News - Extended news is for stories which have been posted previously and have updated or newer information.

Free Republic - This category is reserved for Free Republic business.

Front Page News - Front page is for stories which are not breaking news, but would be found on the front page of a newspaper.

9 posted on 01/27/2008 3:10:15 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo
Had the US record reflected greater toughness, the war itself might have been averted."

Sorry, but that's an ahistorical statement.

When the US threatened Saddam, we had just come off finishing off the Taliban. GWB was taken seriously.

The PROBLEM, in a nutshell, was Chirac and the French. The French, and their actions in the UN security council, were seen as a life preserver to Saddam, and gave him hope that he could wait out GWB's political offensive and survive.

The actions of the French made the US "surounding Iraq" tactic fail to dislodge Saddam, and made the invasion inevitable.

Let the shame lay where it deserves.

11 posted on 01/27/2008 3:22:53 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo
Had the US record reflected greater toughness, the war itself might have been averted."

So how does one demonstrate toughness? This means we should have finished Saddam off in the early 90s.

12 posted on 01/27/2008 3:35:28 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AlternateEgo

Saddam really was a “perfect enemy”. That is, he went out of his way to do everything he could to guarantee American action. Almost by the numbers. He broke every international rule he could, clearing the path for the US. He even humiliated his international supporters, who while not liking him, dislike the US more.

Compare him to Iran. While also full of bluff and bluster, arrogance and belligerence, Iran knows when to back down, such as when Reagan was elected. Iran knows that you can only taunt the tiger so much before you become lunch.


14 posted on 01/27/2008 4:46:42 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson