Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survivors detail Suharto-era massacres
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/27/08 | Anthony Deutsch - ap

Posted on 01/27/2008 3:11:35 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: arthurus

Don’t forget Korea on that list of hot cold warism.


21 posted on 01/27/2008 4:03:28 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

and Mozambique and Angola and Peru and China and Quemoy and Burma and Algeria and... and... and...


22 posted on 01/27/2008 4:10:20 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Another 186,xxx died due to killings.” Makes sense.


23 posted on 01/27/2008 4:18:18 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco

Their is no doubt that the communists in Indonesia were backed by Russian and China. Killing off the communists and back Soeharto gave Indonesia a whole new direction and opened it to US and the west and drove out the Soviets.
This was part of the containment and reversal strategy in Asia.
I started working with Indonesian business’s in 1971 while based in Asia and helped to organize and develop one of the biggest private companies there. That company now has hundreds of “middle class” employees.


24 posted on 01/27/2008 4:45:12 PM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

and... and... and...

Yep.

For a Cold War, it had a lot of hot fronts.


25 posted on 01/27/2008 4:53:33 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: arthurus; Oldexpat; tanuki; Enterprise; John123; Grimmy

The sad thing that is overlooked in the discussion of Suharto is how his victory over Indonesian Communism rendered the whole Vietnam war so goddammed unnecessary.

The ‘Domino Theory’ was based on the assumption that if Vietnam fell then so would Thailand and Malaysia and then the Communists would get what they really wanted; Indonesia. Indonesia was the target of the Japanese in the Second World War and it was the target for the Communists. With its vast reserves of oil, rubber, tin, copper, bauxite, gold etc it was the jewel in the crown.

In 1965 Indonesia had the third largest Communists party in the world and they looked set to take over the country from the shambolic rule of Sukarno. But then Suharto handed their asses to them on a plate and in three months without using a single US soldier he wiped out the Communists and utterly destroyed them. After that Indonesia was firmly anchored in the western sphere of influence.

With Indonesia secure, and Malaysia and Singapore likewise under the Brits and Australia in the south and an American supported Philippines there was no need to worry about Indo-China, if they fell to Communism it would be no great loss to the world, as indeed happened but instead 55,000 young Americans were to die in a pointless war and America was to suffer a defeat from which it has still not fully recovered.


26 posted on 01/27/2008 5:12:24 PM PST by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

The one strategic benefit of the Vietnam War was sucking the USSR into Afghanistan. That was the Big Domino.


27 posted on 01/27/2008 5:33:30 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tanuki

Indonesia’s dark year shut the lights off for the USSR and China in Indonesia.


28 posted on 01/27/2008 5:35:37 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

Indonesia was, indeed, the prize for that whole part of the world. Control of Indonesia would have given the Communists control of the major part of world sea traffic including oil transport, as well as another large source of oil.


29 posted on 01/27/2008 5:52:45 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I just dont want to call this guy as a saint.

You are comparing apples to oranges here. Nobody on this board would say Suharto was a "saint."

The truth was Suharto used brutal methods to eradicate the communists threat.

The only other option for the people would be total capitulation to the communists. Then we would be talking about this thirty some years later about how MILLIONS of people died...

30 posted on 01/27/2008 5:57:04 PM PST by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Indonesia’s rivers ran red with Chinese blood in ‘68. The islamic bumi purta (native Indonesians) ran government and the military. It was all about economics not politics. The ethnic Chinese had the money and Bumi Putra had the power. When the killing was done, the surviving Chinese revised their payroll.

Ethic Chinese disguise their roots with weird names like Soeryadjaya to blend in with their dangerous hosts.

31 posted on 01/27/2008 6:14:52 PM PST by Broker (Grandpa Petti Bones wants to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Broker

Economics was a major part of it. Politics played its part, too. The Communists tried to organize a coup and the reaction did not stop with the dead and captured actors. It was an excuse to capture the Chinese money and eliminate them from positions of power and influence, social as well as political. Henry VIII’s move against the Catholic Mmonasteries and Catholics generally came from the same desires. The Catholics controlled much of the wealth in Britain and Henry was broke. That move also served to detach Britain from the Continent. Suharto detached Indonesia from the Communist enterprise while getting control the resources. There is not much new under the Sun.


32 posted on 01/27/2008 6:34:13 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mylife
The biggest problem here is that Suharto didn’t do these things to defend liberty and democracy.

All his people suffered while he prospered

Which leads to the question, what were the conditions that recruited people to the communists?

33 posted on 01/27/2008 7:05:28 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

Oh they were worse. much worse.

No doubt about it.


34 posted on 01/27/2008 7:08:53 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mylife

The Indonesian communists were worse than Suharto, I presume you mean. How so? Did they kill as many as Suharto did?

But back to my question, what were the conditions that made the Communists attractive to so many poor Indonesians?


35 posted on 01/27/2008 7:13:54 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

I mean the conditions were bad under Sukarno.
That lead to the popularism of communism.
Suharto didn’t really alleviate the oppression he just rounded up the rabble rousers and killed them.

Megawati Sukarnoputri finally brought some democracy to the place, though there are so many poor with no opportunity’s there it is staggering.


36 posted on 01/27/2008 7:19:53 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

You might want to ask yourself what still makes communism so attractive to so many mindless idiots here in the US.

Rational reasoning is not always required or even desired. Fairy tales and make believe are a huge portion of the communist pipe dream. That, and appealing directly to the most base and destructive hatred of envy that can reside in men’s souls.

Of course, among the elites of the world, there’s ever only been two options since the fall of the aristocracy.

Everything must either be fascism or communism. The uniquely evil American thing is never even considered as a possibility.


37 posted on 01/27/2008 8:50:41 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“I mean the conditions were bad under Sukarno.”

I think of Sukarno as being a Robert Mugabe type leader, a man who fought for his people’s independence but who then went on to bankrupt his country in pursuit of his own egomania.


38 posted on 01/28/2008 12:40:03 AM PST by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy
The only real options available when confronted with an implacable enemy is to kill them or submit to them.

Or you can find and eliminate the factor which makes them your implacable enemy.

The radical element is supported by Saudi oil money. We started really having problems with them once Saudi money started funding radical madrassahs and radical imams. The radical mosques would dry up and blow away if they had to get their funding from people who needed to actually work for a living

39 posted on 01/28/2008 5:04:26 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy
Rational reasoning is not always required or even desired. Fairy tales and make believe are a huge portion of the communist pipe dream. That, and appealing directly to the most base and destructive hatred of envy that can reside in men’s souls.

I think the communists also frequently exploit real injustices. For example, in South Vietnam, the US kept urging the government there to implement land reform, also a communist cause.

In Indonesia during Suharto's time, I wonder what injustices, like feudal land arrangements perhaps, the communists exploited.

40 posted on 01/28/2008 6:37:53 AM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson