Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As of November 1, 2007 Rmey is anti internet tax and in favor fo making it permanent
1 posted on 01/27/2008 4:29:45 PM PST by DWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DWar

What does that mean?


2 posted on 01/27/2008 4:31:19 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar
think the indication of the house vote indicates that most American’s are of the point of view that Internet only taxes of the type you describe are not something we want to see. I have a specific position on that issue, but I do not want to see internet only taxes as you described them or access fees or email charges and so forth.

Doublespeak. This the candidate I have left to vote for?
4 posted on 01/27/2008 4:47:28 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar
MA: Ok, great. Let’s jump into internet taxes, some news today on that actually. The 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act bars federal state and local governments from taxing internet access or imposing discriminatory internet only taxes. Things like bit taxes, bandwidth taxes, email taxes. It doesn’t of course prohibit states from collecting sales taxes on things like e-commerce. It was twice extended by Congress and actually was set to expire this Thursday, but last week the Senate voted to extend the ban and then this morning the house voted 402-0 to approve the bill as well for a 7 year extension. I’d just like to get your position on internet only taxes.

MR: I think the indication of the house vote indicates that most American’s are of the point of view that Internet only taxes of the type you describe are not something we want to see. I have a specific position on that issue, but I do not want to see internet only taxes as you described them or access fees or email charges and so forth. We do enough taxing in this country and let’s not add more taxes. I’d rather see the tax for innovation reduced rather than expanded.

MA: It seems like along general party lines the Republicans wanted a permanent ban and Democrats wanted something less than that and they compromised on 7 years. Do you have any particular position on whether the ban should be permanent?

MR: Well I think it makes more sense to make it permanent. I think the Democrats recognized that if they do it every 7 years then they can go out and get contributions from companies that care and then vote for it every 7 years. It’s an old political ploy which is bring it back for a vote regularly and go back and hit people up for contributions…

5 posted on 01/27/2008 4:48:27 PM PST by DWar (The perfect is the enemy of the excellent!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar

BTW, I don’t think “anti-internet-tax” (which is a great position) is the same as being for the rights of states to charge sales tax on items their own citizens purchase over the internet.


11 posted on 01/27/2008 5:29:58 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar

Not real hot on his H1-B position, as I feel the whole program is basically a scam to bring in cheap labor for tech employers. There’s no shortage of tech talent in this country.


15 posted on 01/27/2008 5:56:49 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1960485/posts

He apparently wants to tax internet sales, according to this.


16 posted on 01/27/2008 7:31:06 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DWar

         Mitt Romney

17 posted on 01/27/2008 7:49:40 PM PST by SheLion (Fred was the only one I cared for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson