Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DWar

“I have a specific position on that issue, but I do not want to see internet only taxes as you described them or access fees or email charges and so forth. “

No, I don’t think he changed his mind. The statement above has room in it for state-based sales taxes of net transactions, he just didn’t bring it up.

Plus, if he calls it a “transaction fee to support commiunications infrastructure”, it’s not a tax at all.


20 posted on 01/28/2008 5:54:02 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow
MR: I do not want to see internet only taxes as you described them or access fees or email charges and so forth. We do enough taxing in this country and let’s not add more taxes. I’d rather see the tax for innovation reduced rather than expanded.

MA: It seems like along general party lines the Republicans wanted a permanent ban and Democrats wanted something less than that and they compromised on 7 years. Do you have any particular position on whether the ban should be permanent?

MR: Well I think it makes more sense to make it permanent.

People hear what they want.
To you it sounds as if he has left wiggle room to impose a tax. To me it sounds like he is against the internet tax and wants it to be permanently banned.

21 posted on 01/28/2008 7:54:57 AM PST by DWar (The perfect is the enemy of the excellent!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson