Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Conservative Looks for Reasons to Believe in John McCain
North Star Writers Group ^ | January 28, 2008 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 01/28/2008 6:06:30 AM PST by Invisigoth

There are so many things wrong with the Republican Party nominating John McCain for president, it is hard to know where to begin.

But listing all his shortcomings may be a waste of time. Conservatives may soon have to seriously consider whether, in spite of all the reasons he has given us to doubt him, we can find a way to make peace with him and hope for the best.

I think I can, but he doesn’t make it easy.

When McCain was wooing the mainstream media by spearheading his unconstitutional campaign finance reform bill, opposing the Bush tax cuts, denouncing torture of terror suspects and helping Democrats block conservative judicial nominees, I was one of many livid conservatives who vowed that if he ever ended up winning the Republican nomination, I would stay home.

(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; election; johnmccain

1 posted on 01/28/2008 6:06:32 AM PST by Invisigoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Invisigoth
First, McCain clearly sought positive media coverage to help him reach the White House. If he actually gets there, he may consider the operation a fait accompli. Second, there is no chance the media will love him once he becomes a Republican president. One suspects McCain will realize this quickly, and perhaps he will conclude that doing the people’s business is more important than maintaining the affection of his fair-weather friends in the press.

This guy is delusional.

2 posted on 01/28/2008 6:09:04 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Invisigoth

Good article. I’ve decided that voting Huckabee is the best way to give a “none-of-the-above” vote that has a chance of throwing the nomination to the convention, where we can at least hope that a conservative in the major areas will be nominated.


3 posted on 01/28/2008 6:10:22 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
I hate McCain the least, so he gets my vote. Its more a vote against the others and I know he can beat Hillary. Obama would beat him.

I won’t be disappointed in a McCain presidency.

I have no expectations.

Bush was a huge disappointment.

4 posted on 01/28/2008 6:16:41 AM PST by JRochelle ("Her positions are not terrible relevant to my campaign." Mitt about Ann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Faageddabaaaht him.
Iffen it’s McNutt—I’m going fishing.
I WILL NOT vote for an anti-Republican Republican candidate.
Nohow.


5 posted on 01/28/2008 6:18:23 AM PST by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

a brokered convention goes to the INSIDERS.

Tossing a vote to the Huckster fraud is wasting a vote.

Just pick a front runner.

Remember Fox News Dynamics had Kerry up by 5 and that was outside the margin of error in 2004.

Don’t vote McCain don’t vote Huckster, brokered conventions are for the insiders NOT the delegates.


6 posted on 01/28/2008 6:20:19 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

Vote Huckabee then, particularly if you are in a Southern state or a state that is not winner take all. None of these guys are getting over 30%, 35% of the vote in their wins. They may not be able to patch together a majority if 3 candidates fight to the convention . . . and then we get a reset hopefully and a chance to pick a solid conservative.


7 posted on 01/28/2008 6:20:36 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

If we don’t take this to the convention we assuredly get Romney or McCain. That’s bad. Better a chance at a good nominee than those two . . .


8 posted on 01/28/2008 6:21:39 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I am so tired of these people lecturing me on “fiscal conservatism” when every one of them are getting a government check.

Hickabee, McLame and Julie-Annie will get a government welfare pension with the Rolls-Royce health benefits.

And the whole bunch is telling us we should pay for public housing and other goodies for illegal immigrants because they do the jobs we won’t.

Then, on top of all this:

They say they have some government program to create jobs!

They have some government program to bail out bad mortgage lenders!

Lyin’ sacks of shiite.

All the while Romney is the only one of them not getting a government check!


9 posted on 01/28/2008 6:23:41 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Invisigoth

I know exactly where to begin...

I am so tired of these people lecturing me on “fiscal conservatism” when every one of them are getting a government check.

Hickabee, McLame and Julie-Annie will get a government welfare pension with the Rolls-Royce health benefits.

And the whole bunch is telling us we should pay for public housing and other goodies for illegal immigrants because they do the jobs we won’t.

Then, on top of all this, they say:

They have some government program to create jobs!

They have some government program to bail out bad mortgage lenders!

Lyin’ sacks of shiite.

All the while, Romney is the only one of them not getting a government check!


10 posted on 01/28/2008 6:24:54 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

conventions are not where delegates are “independent” often delegates are delegates because they will do as their broker tells them. Also consider the existences of super delegates who basically count multiple times.

The notion of brokered conventions with delegates freely voting is dead with antiquity.


11 posted on 01/28/2008 6:33:13 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

They are free after the first ballot I think. Depends on the state rules.


12 posted on 01/28/2008 6:34:39 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Republicans don’t have a super-delegate system. That’s a Democratic party thing.


13 posted on 01/28/2008 6:36:18 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

then I give 1/2 horay.


14 posted on 01/28/2008 6:40:19 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Yah, my very limited understanding of the convention rules is that the Dems put in the super-delegate system after the chaos of the 1970’s conventions. Republicans didn’t follow suit. It’s the only hope I see (even if outside) of getting a conservative candidate . . . the convention. McCain could end up being a good president but we know he would gladly sign an amnesty. Romney is worse in my view since he’s not reliable on any issue, including small government, abortion, or the war. Romney did call for a “secret” pullout date . . . that sort of thinking is disastrous.


15 posted on 01/28/2008 6:50:00 AM PST by Greg F (Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Invisigoth

McInsane does not have the temerment to lead our nation, he is unbalanced. As he gets older his condition will worsen.


16 posted on 01/28/2008 6:53:20 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Invisigoth

There’s no need to fret about voting for McPain. There are plenty of lefties that will vote for him in your place. Take the day off.


17 posted on 01/28/2008 7:02:19 AM PST by BufordP (Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
"Also consider the existences of super delegates who basically count multiple times."

I thought the "super-delegate" idea was a "Democrat thing"--did the Repubicans fall for that stupidity, too???

18 posted on 01/28/2008 7:06:28 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
Bush was a huge disappointment.Yes. LOL. Bush has made all sorts of things possible, hasn't he? McCain as the GOP nominee, Hillary or Obama as president, open borders forever, unlimited government growth and control. I sure hope Bush gets some credit for everything he's done for conservatives, patriots and the country.
19 posted on 01/28/2008 7:11:42 AM PST by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson