To: metmom; Gabz
And if it were a dangerous epidemic, wouldn't it make sense to vaccinate males too? They're half the transmission vectors, even if they can't get cervical cancer.
22 posted on
01/28/2008 6:00:00 PM PST by
Tax-chick
("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
To: Tax-chick
I’ve heard there’s kinds of cancers you don’t even want to know about that they can get from HPV, also.
So just why is everyone so hot to push this vaccine and use it on women? Why not men? Is there something the makers of the vaccine don’t want us to know about? Are they watching and waiting to see what side effects occur in the women first? Using them as guinea pigs, like they want to by mandating in for use on age groups that it wasn’t tested on?
Have you seen any black helicopters lately? :)
27 posted on
01/28/2008 6:08:14 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Tax-chick
And if it were a dangerous epidemic, wouldn't it make sense to vaccinate males too? They're half the transmission vectors, even if they can't get cervical cancer.Um...yes. Merck is working on exactly this angle as we speak. I don't suppose that will comfort you. It doesn't me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson