OFFICIAL FLORIDA PRIMARY THREAD

Freeperville ^ | 1-29-08 | self

[TheBattman]

I completely agree...thus the reason I cannot vote for McCain.

[top 2 toe red]

;^)

[getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL]

Good grief. Would you kindly lay off the DU-esque name-calling? I mean, is that the best analysis you have to offer the FReeper community, calling us and those running on the GOP ticket names?

My goodness, if you really believe you are so gifted and we are well beneath you, why don’t you consider starting your own website and following?

[SkyPilot]

You really think that living in MA should eliminate you from any consideration.

Nope - I would support any real Conservative from MA.

McCain is proud to have Liberman campaign with him. Proud of the NYT endorsement and says he would sign into law Amnesty first chance he gets. Clinton would at least galvanize the GOP and further damage the DNC. McCain would destroy the GOP. I for one will vote Clinton over McCain. I would consider a third party to oppose McCain. I am hardly alone.

Amen to McPain being a liberal who doesn't deserve any Conservatives vote. I agree with everything you said there. I feel the same way about Romney too. He is a liberal and I (and thousands like me) won't give him our vote and will either sit out the election or vote third party.

So, given your feelings on McInsane, you should understand and respect our vehement disagreement with Romney, who up until 30 months ago was universally recognized as a liberal, but now he wants to try and convince everyone he is a Conservative.

Gomer Huckster isn't even an option (and I am an Evangelical Christian).

[Waryone]

So you’re a judge lest ye be judged kind of person.

Well I haven’t condemned Romney to hell yet, ie. throwing stones at him.

I can judge (by his fruit — actions and words) whether I will vote for him or not, and I set the rules as to what is acceptable to me. If you don’t like it, too bad. You are not my god; so you don’t get to tell me what to do with my vote.

[COgamer]

“When condemning/damning someone/anyone [Romney], that person [JR; you, IF you did, too.] should be pure as the driven snow and without faults before doing so.”

That’s just plain idiotic. So we shouldn’t criticize Hillary unless we’re flawless? We shouldn’t criticize Iran? We shouldn’t criticize Putin? Don’t say that isn’t what you said, it IS. Your quote placed here, but legible:

“When condemning/damning someone/anyone, that person should be pure as the driven snow and without faults before doing so.”

[top 2 toe red]

Uh...I do believe there is maybe just a TAD of difference in the definition of condemning/damning and that of criticize.

...and that, my friend, is not legible.

[top 2 toe red]

You are not my god; so you don’t get to tell me what to do with my vote.

Well, just damn...I thought I was, so I thought I could.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Thank you for your kind words.

[BobS]

"Oh yeah, I’m only saying once in a while I “think about” giving up politics...

There seems to be anger under the surface this year at McCain after talking to people today about last night. He will lose the jobs of a lot of other elected people as the nominee.

[supercat]

The place to click is on the 58 of 105.

Did you try it? At least on FireFox, it pulls up post 58 of this thread. I did manage to find the cited message, but the links you posted are indeed broken.

[Reaganite1984]

This is where I get off the bus.

I could stomach voting for Giuliani, or Huckleberry, or even that quasi-senile lunatic Ron Paul.

But nominating Capt. Queeg is basically telling me and thousands of other patriotic, conservative Americans that we have no place in the "evolving" GOP.

[Waryone]

Yes, I did try it. I get there every time and I’m using Firefox as well. All I did was copy and paste page source. I checked it both in preview mode and after I posted it. It works fine.

Check your tabs in Firefox, sometimes when I think they have taken me back to my original page, I find I am just in the wrong tab.

[supercat]

All I did was copy and paste page source. I checked it both in preview mode and after I posted it. It works fine.

Hmm... here's what I see in the page source for that link:

<a href="posts?page=58#58">58</a>

Relative, rather than absolute page reference. I can't imagine how the link would go to the other thread on your machine.

[Reaganite1984]

... to Swift Boat him just before the election.

Could we please stop using that term as a verb?

Unless you mean "tell the truth about a dishonorable individual," because that's what the Swifties did in their campaign to expose John Kerry as the fraud he is, was, and always will be.

[Waryone]

Here is the pertinent part of my original post that contains the reference to Jim Robinson's post.

Posted by Jim Robinson to counterpunch
On News/Activism 01/29/2008 11:48:38 PM EST · 58 of 105

Here is the exact source code I copied for the part you are interested in:

a href="/focus/f-news/1961787/posts?page=58#58">58 of 105

The only thing missing from the above source code is the opening < (less than sign) so it would print completely.

The source code you say you found shows this:

a href="posts?page=58#58">58

I have no idea why you have this or where it is from. Perhaps you are not looking at the proper place to click on or you left something out in the source code when you copied it. As you can see from the original post above, with your source code showing only 58, it would be impossible for the code in your post to have shown the "58 of 105" as my original post and its source code does.

So, I don't know where you are looking or why you are having this trouble, sorry.

[TAdams8591]

"But Romney is the best fighter the Repubs can put up against Hill/Obama. He’s so presidential compared to any of the candidates. He’s articulate and sharp as a tack. He’s a SUPERB debater and will tear apart the Marxist/socialist ideals of Hitlery or Mocha Obama."

Yes, he's articulate and sharp as a tack. I like that.