Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

Well, yes. That was my desire. And even though it seems to have had the opposite effect, I do think it is nice to have a higher moral code. If we all had a higher moral code, we wouldn’t have to argue over candidates who were flawed.

But I don’t expect to elect Jesus in my lifetime.So whoever I vote for will be a flawed human, like me. There are some compromises I will not make, even for the lesser of two evils. But I don’t apologize for requiring myself to think about, and make a rational decision, about what level of compromise I WILL make when choosing which candidate I will support.

Still, I am sorry that my choice of words deterred you from reading and responding to the substance of my post. I would benefit from your point of view, and believe you could benefit from mine.


3,430 posted on 01/30/2008 12:20:31 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3405 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Save your time, pal. I’m not interested in reading a pile of Romney supporting spew.

This is all I need to know about the man’s moral character:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4


3,431 posted on 01/30/2008 12:23:44 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3430 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson