Posted on 01/31/2008 4:09:19 AM PST by Kaslin
Now the race is down to John McCain and Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee. The conservative coalition is looking for one of them to take up the mantle of Ronald Reagan in truth, not just in name. If one of them does, he can win in November. If not, the next president of America will be a Democrat.
The only way a Republican can take the White House this year is if the GOP nominee both energizes his party base and also has strong crossover appeal for millions of swing voters. Only a Republican candidate who both secures his base and embodies change can win.
Many speak of the three-legged stool of the Reagan coalition: economic, social, and national security conservatives. But sometimes that metaphor doesn’t quite cut it.
There are more than three types of conservatives. Though they may all look alike to others, they are passionate about different priorities.
In reality, there are several key groups within conservatism. Among Senator McCain and Governors Romney and Huckabee, whoever can convince each element of this coalition that he is acceptable will unite the Republican Party.
Among social conservatives, the number one issue is definitely judges. Judicial nominations are the core motivator behind the pro-life movement, Christian conservatives, and — after the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment case — perhaps gun voters as well. Any nominee who does not take a clear, firm stand on nominating the right kind of judges will not win in November, as anywhere between four and 10 million conservative voters would stay home. As hard as this is for other Republicans to understand, this is an absolute deal breaker with millions of conservatives.
Christian conservative voters generally form the pro-life and traditional marriage crowd, and are also passionate about religious freedom, home schooling, and raising their children with their beliefs.
Millions of pro-life voters will not vote for anyone they perceive as uncommitted on life. Though their priorities include abortion funding, abstinence education, and stem cells, judges trump everything for them. They are essentially single issue on the federal courts.
Second Amendment voters can save or doom any election. Since the NRA started endorsing a president in 1980, the two times it refused to endorse the Republican, 1992 and 1996, are the two times Republicans lost. Bill Clinton himself said the NRA cost Al Gore the White House. In addition to legislation and regulation, this year the Supreme Court may become a top issue for them, as well.
Economic conservatives mainly care about two things: taxes and spending. Republican leaders have been fantastic on the first, and terrible on the second. Government regulation, tort reform, and health care are also issues.
Then there are philosophical conservatives. These people are committed to limited government, understanding that the Constitution only empowers the federal government to do certain things, leaving issues like public safety, health, and morality to the states.
Finally, there are national security conservatives. While they may divide over FISA and the Patriot Act, all are united in expanding and supporting our military and being on offense against radical Islamic terrorism.
Some will say all of these conservatives will simply come around at the end of the day. Don’t bet on it. However, if Hillary Clinton is the nominee she will indeed energize and motivate the Republican base. There are literally millions of conservatives who will not vote unless they perceive a candidate who welcomes them in the Republican Party and takes up their cause.
Others will say that a moderate ticket can pick up more votes in the middle than it would lose on the right. Dead wrong. Up to 10 million votes would be lost. And, some of the votes Republicans would lose are not just votes, they are the contributors and the grassroots forces. Without them, the Republican nominee cannot beat what will be a fiercely motivated Democratic Party.
It’s key to emphasize that the Republican nominee need not be the first choice for all of these groups. He does not need to be a crusader for them. He must simply be a friend, rather than neutral or — worse yet — an adversary.
The would-be nominee must simply be someone for whom each group says, “He’s not everything I hoped for, but he’s good enough that I’ll fight for him.” He must show that his agenda will reflect their core concerns, and never abandon those commitments in the face of a Democratic Congress for legislation, or a Democratic Senate for judicial confirmations.
The Republican nominee must do these things. If so, he may well lead a united party to win in November. If not, he will lose, and everything from the Supreme Court to taxes to spending to Iraq to Social Security to border security to health care will be lost as well.
That self obsessed SOB McCain is going to bring the GOP and much more importantly, the country down. It’s all about this demented man and what he wants. I do not wish him well. To hell with him. He has no country, there is only McCain.
That’s easy...no conservative would vote for McCain....
That only leaves Romney....
Note: Not a choice for Romney...just what’s left...
“The conservative coalition is looking for one of them to take up the mantle of Ronald Reagan in truth, not just in name.”
We are way past that, what we wanted was a candidate whose record embodied the Reagan mantle, not a Johnny-come-lately that is trying to weasel word us to get our vote!
Well done Mr. Blackwell!
True.
Well, if the FedGov gets too crazy, it’s a good thing we still have states’ rights (oh, wait, Pubbies helped sell those down the river...)
Jan says...McCain, McCain, McCain.
The MSM always talks about McCain.
Arnold, Rudy, Martinez, weren’t these the same ones clamoring about how we needed shamnesty!
McCain was shamless last night, with that sh&% eat’n grin plastered on his mug.
Cleaning out the house and I came across a “Reagan for President” poster. I got to thinking - with the stiffs running for President, why can’t we dig up President Reagan and put him in the White House? He would be more lively and wouldn’t do the damage that these clowns would.
REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT - AGAIN.
We can;t run Reagan again, if for no other reason, because of the 22nd Amendment.
But even with out it, I think his vice president would just assume the presidency immediately.
Otherwise FDR would STILL be president today...
However, we COULD run Ron Reagan Jr.
He couldn’t be any worse than McCain...
We can’t run Reagan again, if for no other reason, because of the 22nd Amendment.
But even with out it, I think his vice president would just assume the presidency immediately.
Otherwise FDR would STILL be president today...
However, we COULD run Ron Reagan Jr.
He couldn’t be any worse than McCain...
Frankly both McCain and Romney are unacceptable (they’re two thirds in the RinoTriad=(RudyMcRomney). I won’t vote for nor support either one, frankly they can go cry8ing back to NYC for all I care..GAG ME WITH A SPOON COVERED IN BARF!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.