Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With 'change' in mind, voters voice expectations for the next president
Associated Press Writers/Yahoo ^ | By NANCY BENAC and TREVOR TOMPSON

Posted on 01/31/2008 9:46:41 AM PST by flowerplough

American voters have a decidedly negative view of how things are going in the country but they are confident that the next president will have the power to change much of what is wrong.

Some things, however, may be too much even for the president to change.

According to a new Associated Press-Yahoo! News survey, large majorities of voters believe the president has considerable sway on issues such as inflation, interest rates, the federal deficit, taxes and more. Fully three-quarters believe the president has at least some influence over health care costs. And 69 percent can see the president making gasoline prices go up or down.

They are less certain, though, about the president's ability to change how things really work in Washington: 55 percent think it's possible; 44 percent are doubtful, no matter who's elected.

Call it optimism with a cynical streak. Or cynicism with an optimistic streak.

( ... )

The latest poll, third in the series, found that Democrats are more likely to believe in the power of the president—whatever his or her background—to change things. Republicans and independents, for their part, are much less likely to think a president can have influence over the big issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; change; dnctalkingpoints; yellowjournalism
Idiocy rampant in huge swaths of the American populace?

"large majorities of voters believe the president has considerable sway on issues such as inflation, interest rates, the federal deficit, taxes and more. Fully three-quarters believe the president has at least some influence over health care costs. And 69 percent can see the president making gasoline prices go up or down."

Most of us are quite unable to lose weight or save more money, but we just know that a new Daddy will do some of this other stuff for us?

1 posted on 01/31/2008 9:46:42 AM PST by flowerplough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Another presidential term for the Clintons represents “change”? A change “back” maybe but nothing “new” except more of the same in overdrive.


2 posted on 01/31/2008 9:52:57 AM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
Call it optimism with a cynical streak. Or cynicism with an optimistic streak.

Call it what it really is: Stoopid.

(And yes, I really DO know how to spell stupid)

3 posted on 01/31/2008 9:54:47 AM PST by Mygirlsmom (Wish for Fred in one hand and Mitt in the other and see what you have more of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Notice how reference to solving a priority issue, illegal immigration, was buried in reference.

A President cannot effect major change without the support of congress. And Congress will never change because they are working for certain goals detrimental to national sovergnity.

The only thing congress is capable of changing on a regular basis is their underwear. or the stench would overpower global warming and incite the people into removing the smell at whatever cost necessary.


4 posted on 01/31/2008 9:59:31 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
According to a new Associated Press-Yahoo! News survey, large majorities of voters believe the president has considerable sway on issues such as inflation, interest rates, the federal deficit, taxes and more. Fully three-quarters believe the president has at least some influence over health care costs. And 69 percent can see the president making gasoline prices go up or down.

Well, presidents do have the power to make these things much worse. They don't have much power to make them better.

5 posted on 01/31/2008 10:11:31 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
You're right. The President can't do much other than jawbone and browbeat from the bully pulpit. Basically a cheerleader. Congress has ultimate authority by controlling expenditures.

OTOH, the Congress can't really do much either to "hurt" the President. They can try to impeach him, and we saw what good that did with Clinton. They can deny funding for things the President wants to do. That may or may not get them in hot water with constituents or special interest groups. They (the Senate) can deny the President his appointments. But the President is still going to be around.

So there isn't much either one can really do. The Founders wanted it this way. In some ways, they wanted it difficult for the government to make sudden, major changes in the way the country operates. That's because they knew that if they made it too easy, the natural human tendency when things might be a little rough is to look to government to "do something, anything". And it is the usual tendency of large bureaucracies to muck things up, even if their intentions are pure and altruistic.

6 posted on 01/31/2008 10:11:54 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson