Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
It isn’t all that complicated. Children born to parents who are members of hostile, invading or occupying armies are automatically excluded from birthright citizenship by legislation, not constitutional amendment. Accordingly, legislation is all which is needed to exclude anchor babies from automatic citizenship.
5 posted on 01/31/2008 6:54:10 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
We have a variety of treaties with Mexico that keep their citizens within Mexican jurisdiction when they visit this country.

This has come up in a notorious case of a Mexican murderer who argued his rights were violated in his trial because he had not been notified he could contact his (Mexican) consulate.

Some Freepers want that treaty to be ignored and George Bush wants the treaty provisions recognized by the courts.

If the case is upheld by the courts, and the guy allowed to contact his consulate and then get retried, the implications are that NO MEXICAN can visit the United States and ever be under the jurisdiction of the United States per se.

That means no more Mexican anchor baby citizens.

8 posted on 01/31/2008 7:00:58 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
Accordingly, legislation is all which is needed to exclude anchor babies from automatic citizenship

Legislation that should have passed

10 posted on 01/31/2008 7:09:02 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson