Replies

I agree. The primary thing which makes me not want to support Paul is his stance on the WOT (not specifically Iraq). But I have come to recognize that to use terrorism as a justification to not support Ron Paul (in the absence of a candidate meeting my other requirements) is in fact cowardice - it is to accept that third-world Islamic extremists can dictate whom to vote or not vote for.

A bunch of barbarians are not going to cower me into voting for abortion, to vote for tax increases, to vote for socialized medicine, to vote for deficits, to vote for more illegal immigration, to vote for restrictions on the 2nd amendment, to vote for restrictions on the 1st amendment, to vote for "leaders" willing to bow before UN dictate, to vote for "leaders" happy to destroy the economy by bowing before envirofascist demands (gorebull whoring, stalling/stopping domestic energy operations), nor vote for class envy, nor endorse candidates who hold other positions I detest. And if terrorists can't, then neither will Hillary!

I'd like a candidate solid on everything (including one willing to stomp the bastards stuck in 9 AD back to 2000 BC), but they (Tancredo, Hunter, Thompson) all dropped out. Something has got to give - FEAR will not guide my choice.