Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Survival of early babies 'doubles' (Preemies' early survival reignites abortion debate)
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | February 1, 2008 | Rebecca Smith

Posted on 01/31/2008 7:25:17 PM PST by Stoat

Survival of early babies 'doubles'


By Rebecca Smith, Medical Editor
 
Last Updated: 2:46am GMT 01/02/2008
 

 

The abortion debate is reignited today as figures show that survival rates of babies born very prematurely have doubled in the past 20 years.

  • Have your say: Does this change your view on abortion debate?
  • All evidence tells us to reduce abortion limit
  • Q&A: Why limit abortion?

     

     
    The abortion debate is reignited today as figures show that survival rates of babies born very prematurely have doubled in the past 20 years
    Premature babies are capable of surviving below the current 24-week time limit

     

    A study at one of Britain's top neonatal units found that one third of babies born between 22 and 25 weeks' gestation survived in the early 1980s but this had risen to 71 per cent by the late 1990s.

    The biggest improvements were among the 24 and 25-week babies.

    Campaigners have already called for the 24-week abortion limit to be lowered, but experts have previously argued there has been little improvement in the chances of babies born very early.

    The findings are set to spark a further row over abortion as MPs are tabling amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill to either liberalise terminations or restrict them. The 24-week limit was set in 1990.

    Latest data from the Department of Health show that of the 201,173 abortions in England and Wales in 2006, 1,262 were at 22 weeks or more.

    Of eight babies born alive at 22 weeks at University College London Hospital between 1996 and 2000, four survived to go home. Between 1991 and 1995 only two were born at 22 weeks and neither lived.

    For babies born at 23 weeks the survival rate increased from 44 per cent in 1991-95 to 46 per cent in the late 1990s. At 24 weeks, half the babies born between 1991 and 1995 lived. This rose to 81 per cent for those born in 1995-2000.

    One third of the babies born at 25 weeks in 1991-95 survived, rising to almost three quarters in 1995-2000.

    However, one quarter of all the infants were found to have a disability when they reached their first birthday. This proportion did not improve over the years.

    Julia Millington, from the ProLife Alliance, said: "The current 24-week time limit was set in 1990 based on the gestational age a foetus was considered viable at that time.

    "Neonatal medicine has progressed since then and premature babies are capable of surviving below the current time limit."

    Prof David Field, the president-elect of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine, said: "The viability of premature babies and abortion are completely different arguments that have been muddled up. You either believe in abortion or you don't."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; britain; england; greatbritain; infanticide; murder; murdermostfoul; preemies; uk; unitedkingdom
However, one quarter of all the infants were found to have a disability when they reached their first birthday. This proportion did not improve over the years.

And so this means that they should be killed, then?  PFFFT!

1 posted on 01/31/2008 7:25:19 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; Coleus; cgk; narses; MHGinTN

Ping


2 posted on 01/31/2008 7:25:40 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
"Prof David Field, the president-elect of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine, said: "The viability of premature babies and abortion are completely different arguments that have been muddled up. You either believe in abortion or you don't." 'Professor' are they alive human beings? You either think they are and believe it's okay to slaughter them or you believe they are not to be slaughtered, OR you don't believe they are human beings in which case you're an ass to make an empoerment issue out of the slaughtering of 'not yet human beings' tissues.
3 posted on 01/31/2008 7:32:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Hmmm, this claimed improvement doesn’t sound accurate given their rotten socialist health care system.


4 posted on 01/31/2008 7:52:44 PM PST by mngran2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
Technology and general procedures have advanced, and will continue to advance at a great rate. They’re not as backwards technologically as they seem to be bureaucratically. Modern medicine.
5 posted on 01/31/2008 8:08:07 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
These people are stretching the truth to fit their agenda. I take care of these little darlings and there is more joy and success than can be imagined.
6 posted on 01/31/2008 8:54:03 PM PST by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I love this picture...thought I would share it with you.


7 posted on 01/31/2008 9:04:16 PM PST by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

We are getting very close to the era when a fertilized egg will be able to develop to term and be born completely outside of a woman’s body. At this point, the whole “viability” argument becomes moot, and it gets back to the “humanity” argument.


8 posted on 01/31/2008 9:18:24 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson