Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parallels...in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol
Climatic Change ^ | January 2008 | Marc D. Davidson

Posted on 02/02/2008 6:11:32 PM PST by ricks_place

Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol

Abstract Today, the United States is as dependent on fossil fuels for its patterns of consumption and production as its South was on slavery in the mid nineteenth century. That US congressmen tend to rationalise fossil fuel use despite climate risks to future generations just as Southern congressmen rationalised slavery despite ideals of equality is perhaps unsurprising, then. This article explores similarities between the rationalisation of slavery in the abolition debates and the rationalisation of ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases in the US congressional debates on the Kyoto Protocol.

1 Introduction

On July 4th, 1776, the 13 United States of America unanimously declared to “hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Despite these ‘self-evident truths,’ slavery was upheld in many states and rationalised in congressional debates for almost another century before it was formally abolished by the US Congress in 1865 (see e.g. Jenkins 1935; Tise 1987; Miller 1996). OnJune 12th, 1992, the United States signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), in which the Parties stated their determination “to protect theclimate system for present and future generations.” Despite this commitment, the USCongress has as yet rejected any mandatory regulation of greenhouse gases, including the binding emission targets for the industrialised nations agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol(see e.g. PEW Center on Global Climate Change 2004)...

2 Similarities between slavery and the use of fossil fuels

In this section I argue that the present climate debate shows several fundamental similarities in circumstance with the abolition debate of the mid-nineteenth century.

(Excerpt) Read more at springerlink.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalwarming
Published Paper equates the real evil of slavery with the fairy tale of global warming!
1 posted on 02/02/2008 6:11:36 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
The premise of this article is so flawed, what a load!
2 posted on 02/02/2008 6:13:13 PM PST by chaos_5 (The Republic is doomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Just in case there was any doubt the ‘intellectual’ left has any rationality left.


3 posted on 02/02/2008 6:14:33 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Who is the new slave, Gaia (mother earth)?


4 posted on 02/02/2008 6:19:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McCain: RNC will adore him. Get ready for McCain day in photos & Prayer threads. Oh the humanities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I at last found something I agree with Senator Hagel. Global warming is based on faulty science.
5 posted on 02/02/2008 6:34:11 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
So, we're compared with holocaust deniers and slave owners, because neither one alone carries as much loathing as the alarmists have for us.
6 posted on 02/02/2008 6:47:33 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
This psuedoacademic claptrap reinforces the fact that the “global warming” movement is ideological rather than scientific. Anthropogenic climate change will either be proved or disproved in time by empirical science. That science won’t include alleged parallels between slavery and “global warming.”
7 posted on 02/02/2008 6:56:18 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

What a stinking steamy load of bu11sh!t.


8 posted on 02/02/2008 7:09:33 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
Somebody say "Democrat"?


9 posted on 02/02/2008 7:25:29 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



10 posted on 02/03/2008 5:50:20 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy

Beam me to Planet Gore !

11 posted on 02/03/2008 5:51:45 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson