Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fargo Rock

What Hillary would do to the country would not last as long as any judge she would appoint to the supreme court. We might get some middle of the road feel good judge with some of our current crop of candidates on the republican side. But nothing like the judge Hillary or Obama would appoint. We might not be able to recover from this lesson in our lifetime.


23 posted on 02/02/2008 9:08:14 PM PST by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThomasThomas
LOL, and for proof of that just look at the tower of a conservative judge appointed by Mr. Reagan and not to mention that tower of a conservative judge appoint by bush senior.

Supreme court judges are a crap shoot no matter who appoints them.

28 posted on 02/02/2008 9:11:34 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: ThomasThomas
What Hillary would do to the country would not last as long as any judge she would appoint to the supreme court. We might get some middle of the road feel good judge with some of our current crop of candidates on the republican side. But nothing like the judge Hillary or Obama would appoint.

It was REPUBLICANS who gave us Earl Warren, William Brennan, Harry Blackmun, David Souter, John Paul Stevens, and the like.

REPUBLICANS appointed them, not Dimmycraps. And that is exactly the kind of judge that McLame would appoint, or worse, if there is such a thing as worse than those guys. Ther is no difference between the kidn of judges McVain would appoint and the kind Hitlery would appoint. Not one iota.

179 posted on 02/02/2008 10:58:35 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson