Replies

The dirty little secret is the Hillary will not bring the troops home and saddle herself and the democrats with defeat especially since we are so close now. The surge is clearly working and Hillary has even said that all the troops may not be back until 2012. Hillary also wants to prove that she can be a C in C as a woman and is actually the most hawkish Democrat.

She is also not in support of shutting down Gitmo and would support water boarding in a “nuclear ticking bomb” situation.

I am no Clinton fan by any stretch but I think she is to the right of McCain on several issues and the Republican opposition would be more effective. Electing McCain would give a message to RINO’s that the way to get elected is to become more liberal and that will be very destructive to the conservative movement and consequently the United States.

Also on illegal immigration which is a national security issue I think Hillary is to the right of McCain. McCain has really not changed his mind about amnesty and is a complete open borders guy. Hillary is actually slightly better.

Even on judges, McCain would not appoint a Roberts or Alito so Hillary would be no worse.

So Hillary is actually the more conservative candidate and we would be better off with her in the White House than John McCain. Then enough sheeple may wake up and get real conservatives back in the White House and Congress,

Agree with you. The key words here are the Republican opposition will be more effective. With a RINO in office, we will be forever defending what we should be opposing. With a Democrat in office, the Republicans will be forced to rediscover their spine. The conservative movement will have a decent chance to rebuild and come back to prevail in 2010 and 2012.

And you are right when you say that electing RINOs sends the wrong message. Liberalism has to be sent packing from the Republican party. The Country Club Blue Bloods need to be put back in their place. Reaganism must prevail.