A lie.
I'll lower your taxes, veto wasteful government spending, and ensure our party returns to the smaller government principles on which it began.
Three more lies.
I'll secure our border first before pursuing any other immigration reform.
The Big Lie. I'll appoint conservative judges like justices Alito and Roberts.
A bladfaced lie. I will protect the sanctity of life
Like Dr. Dobson and Ann Coulter, I cannot and will not vote for McVain. I will find a conservative thrid party.
If she wins, the inevitable disaster from the liberal policies they will both pursue (no real difference) will fall on Dimmycraps and ther will most likely be a Republican Congress in 2010 and a Republican President in the Reagan mold in 2012. If he wins, the same policies leading to the same disaster will be the Republican's fault and their responsibility and it may kill the GOP once and for all.
McCain has been doing this every election for years here in Arizona. He pretends to be a good conservative just before an election then after the election he reverts to his favorite pastime of stabbinb us in the back. I just write myself in for whatever he happens to be running for if he’s on the ballot.
If all this was really his agenda, I would vote for the guy with no problem. But his past record does not go along with what this message talks about what he would do.
Well, I for one and a supporter, plan to hold him to his pledges of fighting Al Qaeda to the death, permanent tax cuts, secure border fence and opposing the raging spending by Washington. And, if he lives up to them, I am going to count him as a conservative and a great president.
I, too, got one today. There is nothing more personal than invading one's privacy with promises, and then reneging on them later. It's not the same thing as going to a public rally and hearing a stump speech.
If McCain does become President, and then fails to deliver on the things he called people at home and promised them that he'd do, I hope there is some way to shame him for what he did in a way that would matter.
-PJ
If McCain actually believed this stuff he would have the nomination wrapped up already.
Romney is a RINO too, but he’s not McCain...and that’s good enough for me.
and since my insurance policy does not cover plastic surgery to correct self-inflicted injuries, I guess that is right out of the question.
So Doug, who are you voting for in California this Tuesday?
I got a call from his campaign today (they didn’t identify themselves first) asking who my 1st, 2nd, 3rd choice for president was...when I didn’t mention McCain, they got all flabbergasted.
No McCain in 08.
There’s not one thing in that McCain call that Hillary! would say, even though some on FR insist that they are exactly the same.
“I’ll secure our border first before pursuing any other immigration reform.”
Secure is such a gray word...............
Last week I got two prerecorded calls in one night from the Ron Paul campaign. The second call was disguised as a poll. I expect that I’ll be getting many more calls over the next couple of days. It makes me wonder, have these calls actually changed anyone’s mind, ever?
So, don’t vote for Hitlary, vote for Mcussolini instead? Sorry, Doug. No can do.
Hillary’s Secret Police Returns
BY DICK MORRIS AND EILEEN MCGANN
Are the Clinton secret police back on patrol?
It looks like they may be making a late campaign comeback.
In a week-end column, Robert Novak alleged that “agents” of Hillary Clinton are “spreading the word that she has scandalous information” about Barack Obama, but decided not to use it. (How considerate of her!)
Obama has come out swinging, accusing the Clinton campaign of trying to swift-boat him and demanding that Clinton either release the information or admit that there is none.
The Clinton camp is shocked that anyone would ever think that it would use such tactics!
Clinton campaign Communications Director (and KGB enforcer look-alike) Howard Wolfson claimed that the campaign had “no idea” what Novak was talking about. Absolutely!
And, as usual, Wolfson tried to turn the embarrassing issue for Hillary into a problem for Barack, claiming he was naive for believing what was in the Novak column.
“A Republican-leaning journalist runs a blind item designed to set Democrats against one another. Experienced Democrats see this for what it is. Others get distracted and thrown off their games,” Wolfson said.
Does anybody really believe that Hillary hasn’t been gathering dirt on her opponents? Anyone with any experience in politics knows one thing for sure: Hillary Clinton plays the game rough and dirty — and she has a sordid history of using private investigators to find scandals in the background of anyone who gets in her way.
While Hillary righteously lectures the candidates about mudslinging, her boys in the back room are readying the dirt to leak when she’s not doing too well.
Remember in the 1992 campaign when Gennifer Flowers and other women were harassed by private detectives? The Clintons used campaign money to pay over $100,000 to private investigators to scare off the women. (Now they’ve learned to bury their investigative costs in lawyers bills.)
And does anyone think it was a coincidence that Republican speaker of the House and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee were outed for extra-marital affairs just at the time that the impeachment vote was about to take place?
Or that there were off the record calls to journalists from the White House accusing Monica Lewinsky of being a stalker?
And what are the odds that the recent rumors about John Edwards came from Clinton operatives?
That’s how the Clintons try to obliterate their opponents, with Hillary at the helm. As she runs for commander-in-chief of the United States, she’s already the commander of the Clinton secret police.
The Clintons have no regard for the privacy of those who get in their way. Their clumsiness in bullying Linda Tripp cost the Department of Defense about $600,000 when she won her lawsuit for invasion of privacy after they arranged to illegally leak confidential information from her personnel file.
To paraphrase Hillary, privacy is just a word if you don’t have the experience and strength to know what to do about it.
And Hillary sure does know what to do.
As she told Sidney Blumenthal when the Lewinsky scandal broke: “We’ll just have to win.”
Winning at any cost is the Clinton mindset. So watch for more dirty tactics whenever Hillary and her team feel under attack.
Can we really afford to have a president who acts this way?
Clinton health plan may mean tapping pay
Associated Press via YahooNews ^ | Associated Press | Charles Babington
Posted on 02/03/2008 8:52:55 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.
The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC’s “This Week,” she said: “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”
-PJ