It's the prime directive from the Romney Sleaze Machine. With no real case where they can defend Mitt's liberal record their only choice is to employ the liberal tactic of destroying the messenger to silence him or her. |
He could have used a veto. I find it interesting that so many of you are quick to name call when someone disagrees with you... Kind of like the Ron Paul people. When did this become the cry baby forum?
Against what... the SJC? Same-sex marriage in MA was decreed by the Supreme Judicial Court... and an overwhelmingly, DemocRAT Legislature enabled them to do so. Anyone familiar with MA politics knows this... so take your BS somewhere else.
He used what was effectively an executive order...no law.
| It's the prime directive from the Romney Sleaze Machine. With no real case where they can defend Mitt's liberal record their only choice is to employ the liberal tactic of destroying the messenger to silence him or her. |
The MYTHSTERS immediately turn to personal attacks when the truth about the most LIBERAL Republican in the race, MYTH WILLARD, is spoken
My understanding is that the law was passed by a veto-proof margin.
Pray enlighten us. Where in the Massachusetts Constitution is the Governor given the veto over court rulings?
Or perhaps you are refering to vetoing bad legislation? Romney vetoed over 1,000 times. He was overridden by the Legislature over 700 times. How many vetoes has Bush used?