Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RepublitarianRoger2
So you are saying one of the three stooges who can't gain any momentum from state to state can be a strong candidate...let's be real. The real reason none of the three has taken over the primaries is because they are terrible candidates.


16 posted on 02/03/2008 12:31:17 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: big'ol_freeper

No, I’m not saying that the three stooges are strong candidates, either. I’m not sure how you made that inference from what I said.

Don’t get me wrong; I’d like to see any of the people you named rather than the folks that are in there now. But I’m just playing devil’s advocate here. If Hunter and Thompson, for example, couldn’t rise to the top over the three stooges who are “terrible candidates,” instead dropping out fairly early on, then what does that say about their campaigning abilities?

I just don’t see ANY really strong candidates in that list. Unfortunately.


28 posted on 02/03/2008 12:50:24 PM PST by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson