Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RepublitarianRoger2
Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Mark Raciot...


8 posted on 02/03/2008 12:13:36 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: big'ol_freeper

I’m not seeing any of those folks as strong candidates. Fred and Hunter would most likely have the same impact they had earlier — which is very little. Hunter particularly had no chance from the start.

Cheney, maybe, but he is a very divisive figure and he is a fixture of the Bush administration, and so carries a lot of Bush’s baggage, however unfair it might be.

Gingrich? Hmm, maybe.

“Mark who?”

I dunno...


14 posted on 02/03/2008 12:26:33 PM PST by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: big'ol_freeper
Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Mark Raciot...

Thompson and Hunter have already demonstrated that they couldn't muster enough Republican votes to stay in. It's unlikely that independents and Dems would consider them. Cheney is a polarizing figure and has a bad heart. Gingrich is even more polarizing and has lots of baggage. Racicot doesn't have enough name recognition. There are slim pickings this election cycle.

22 posted on 02/03/2008 12:38:44 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson