Posted on 02/03/2008 8:40:11 PM PST by Dawnsblood
Clinton would actually be better than Obama by a long shot on the War on Terror.
Obama wants a “summit” with people who give the infidels only three choices - conversion, dhimmitude, or death.
Clinton, however, no matter her appeal to the kook base (which don’t support her), would continue a reasonably sane effort to keep the jihadis at bay. She saw what Bill’s neglect caused, and doesn’t want that shadow on her.
Our economy would be TOTALLY WRECKED under this Marxist Witch, though. Her op-ed in the WSJ today was pure and unadulterated socialism, with her economic ignorance on full display.
The basis of all her “solutions” actually increase demand and decrease supply, while subsidizing those things (alternative energy) for which there is no demand.
I believe making cock fights illegal was ruled to be “culturally insensitive”.
Wait for the ruling on the exclusion of Sharia Law from our legal system. Wouldn’t want to be “culturally insensitive” to the Muslims, now, would we?
McCain wasn't even on my radar screen. Hard pill to swallow, but he got where he is with votes.
I've had this quote on my profile for years:
"It's not going to be a governor or a senator or a congressman that's going to save the American people," said Lazio. "It's going to be the people themselves that rise up. … You just cannot count on elected people, people who are well-known names, to go out there and do it for us."
The Once and Future Hillary – Hillary's Secret War
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.