Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

Number 4 was answered in the video, but what I find interesting is that you really are no different than the rest of us on this thread, you’re just as skeptical as we are, just for the other team.

I take no issue with that. We’re all flying a bit blind on this one. Male cops stripping a cuffed female prisoner, though, is a bit challenging to justify, regardless of the reason. JMO.


83 posted on 02/04/2008 8:50:35 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
Number 4 was answered in the video, but what I find interesting is that you really are no different than the rest of us on this thread, you’re just as skeptical as we are, just for the other team.

I'm skeptical "for the other team" for the simple reason that experience has taught me never to trust stories like this one, where the only "facts" are those fed to us by the plaintiff's lawyer, by means of a sympathetic reporter.

Experience has shown that one seldom goes wrong by betting that the real facts don't support the claims made by the plaintiff's lawyer.

97 posted on 02/04/2008 9:00:39 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson