If that’s what you believed, then why/how could you question why Huck was attacking Romney over McCain? You asked for a logical reason for the focus on Romney and you got it. I take it you agree it is the logical and appropriate tactic for Huck.
You misinterpret what I said. I contrasted Huck’s strengths to Romney’s weaknesses. How you interpret that as there being no difference between Huck and McCain is beyond me.
The biggest difference between Huck and McCain is Tax Policy, but Huck is equally different from all candidates on that one. Another key one is on sanctity of life. Yet another is his focus on education, and especially the role of arts in education. Unfortunately, I don’t think Huck is with mainstream America on those, so it doesn’t make sense for him to focus on those particular weaknesses.
You misinterpret what I said. I contrasted Huck’s strengths to Romney’s weaknesses. How you interpret that as there being no difference between Huck and McCain is beyond me.
They are both for open borders. They are both for giving benefits to illegals. There are just two.
But since neither one of us is likely to convince the other of anything, and the polls are now closed, its all moot.
At this point even Huck is a better choice than McCain. And hell, he got the support of the Ron Paulistas in WV (Huck isn't a closet 9/11 conspirist is he?).
In any case, your guy did well. Take it easy.