Posted on 02/06/2008 8:45:03 AM PST by westmichman
Shouldn’t that say “Republicans in Name Only” Endorse John McCain?
That is implied I believe,
reading
between the lines.
Hopefully this is the last time I ask this as I hate beating a dead horse, but HOW, HOW, HOW did this man get all these votes from Republicans and most likely a nomination? I feel as though I have been living on Mars for the last four years or in a dream land. I had no idea the liberals had completely overtaken our party--I knew there were specific areas for sure and with no doubt, but the whole banana? Wow.
That graphic is hilarious. I’m going to steal that ...
RINOs endorsing a RINO. Big deal!
Oh, right, Dems don't allow dissent.
I am sick of hearing judgeships....so we might have 2 or 3 more conservatives judges from pool to draw for supreme court....chances are when we get another conservative in the white house, he wont have any good judges too choose. I think we need work more on reigning in the SC than anything. we cant place our bets on our guy getting us a conservative judge in the sc
Not really. One chooses death. The other chooses life.
“Not really. One chooses death. The other chooses life.”
I was speaking of the inherent contradictions of the positions. But I get what you’re saying.
What makes you think he wouldn’t each across the aisle for approval from is good friends regarding judges? He has no history of either appointing or nominating judges. He voted for some but that means nothing.
What makes you think he wouldn’t reach across the aisle for approval from is good friends regarding judges? He has no history of either appointing or nominating judges. He voted for some but that means nothing.
A group like this doesn’t endorse unless they see promise in a candidate (maybe even have received assurances from a candidate).
that bears repeating :p
I just don’t think people can be scared into voting for someone who is unfit to serve. Not anymore.
That’s for sure. We fell for it in the past and look where it’s gotten us.
I heard LImbaugh asking a caller to name the head of the RNC. She couldn't. The Rush said either could he. That says a lot about the party overall.
And I get what you’re saying, now:)
“The important element is judgeships, and I’d rather have him than Hillary or Obama choosing them.”
Not me. McCain would try to fool his own party by claiming his judges are constructionist, while we end up with a Souter or Darth Vader Ginsburg.
At least when Hillary or Obama choose judges, they’ll know they’re in for a hella fight.
Like the fight the Senate gave Bill when he nominated Ginsburg?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.