Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Republican Voter Suppression in Southern Calilfornia!
News Talk Radio | 02-06-08 | PsyOp

Posted on 02/06/2008 9:01:01 AM PST by PsyOp

Reports are rolling into talk radio stations in San Diego about massive Republican vote suppression.

Thousands of Republican voters in San Diego and as far north as Los Angeles showed up to vote on Tuesday only to be told that they were registered "Non-Partisan". This meant that they could not vote for the Republican Primary candidates.

Non-Partisan (independent) voters in California can vote for Candidates in any other party, including the Democrat party, but are prohibited from voting in the Republican Primary unless they are registered as a Republican.

Rick Roberts [http://www.760kfmb.com] is currently reporting on this and has had hundreds of calls and thousands of e-mails from people who showed up to vote only to be told they were not registered as Republcans. Reports began rolling into the Roger Hedgecock show yesterday.

Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as "Non-Partisan".

The Republican Party in California has begun investigating this issue, but the mainstream media continues to report that Californias election "went smoothly".

It seems clear that someone or some group managed to tamper with the voter registration rolls. Either by direct access to the Registrars computer system, or by gaining access to voter information and then sending in registration cards in their name.

Southern California was projected to go heavily in favor in Mitt Romny.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; california; keatingfive; primary; republican; romney; supertuesday; suppression; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-464 next last
To: PsyOp

Lets not start sounding libs stating “XXX” stole the election. If your pissed MCcain or Hillary won CA - get over it.. nothing is going to change that fact. There would have been 100,000 people for anything to change either way. If there is fraud, investigate it... however it had little to no impact on the results.


41 posted on 02/06/2008 9:24:36 AM PST by cdnerds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie
I wonder at what level (in the “state” rep party - and WHO - at the state party level actually made this decision.

In FL and SC and NH, McCain ONLY won by getting cross-over democrats and “independents” to vote FOR him. (Against Romney, essentially.) South FL heavily liberal old white women voted for McCain in FL - otherwise, Romney won the rest of the state.

The CA repubbies “could” have been trying to AVOID democrat pollution in their primary by allowing only registered republicans. Or a McCain “leader” in the party could have predicted just this kind of elimination of Romney voters and prohibited them using this tactic.

We don’t know. yet.

42 posted on 02/06/2008 9:24:43 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Didn’t read the article, did you?


43 posted on 02/06/2008 9:25:33 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
He mentioned us twice :)...also, for that McCain Pro-Choice piece. However, Rush is now suggesting that McCain put the Huckster on as VP and I’m crying here.
44 posted on 02/06/2008 9:26:02 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
New. simplified 2008 Presidental Ballot:

Choose one:

[1] Satan
[2] Antichrist

45 posted on 02/06/2008 9:26:19 AM PST by ZeitgeistSurfer (Liberalism is Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper
Untrue. They could contest the finding and vote with a provisional ballot.

True. They could have, if they had been informed of that fact at the polling places. Most were not. A few who knew demanded a provisional ballot.

46 posted on 02/06/2008 9:26:36 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Brian Sussman was also reporting this last night on KSFO in the Bay Area.

-PJ

47 posted on 02/06/2008 9:27:14 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Actually, there is no FEC at the moment. The Dem-controlled senate has refused to confirm any of Bush's appointees to fill the gaps, and there are not enough current members to constitute a quorum.

Thanks. I had completely missed that. Timing is everything, huh?

48 posted on 02/06/2008 9:27:15 AM PST by TADSLOS (Conservatism means never having to say "I voted for John McCain for the sake of the GOP")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

Perhaps, Romney supporters should ask Al Sharpton for help. Rev. Al is concerned about voting rights.


49 posted on 02/06/2008 9:27:56 AM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Since Romny was heavily favored in San Diego, McCain was the obvious benefactor. However, I doubt he had anything to do with it. This smells of Democrat shenanigans, since their primary is open.


50 posted on 02/06/2008 9:29:01 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as “Non-Partisan”.

This happened to a friend in Watertown NY last night. He is registered as an Independent but they would not let him vote for Ron Paul.

51 posted on 02/06/2008 9:29:27 AM PST by angcat (MITT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
I worked a San Diego county poll yesterday in the south end of Oceanside. We did get several, I'd guestimate 15-20 people who swore they were registered republican and we had them as NP (non-partisan).

Since the repub primary was closed to party members only, these folks were shut out, unless the insisted and then we let them vote provisional, some did that. Provisional means the ballot goes in, but the registrar's office has to confirm that they were really republicans.

Some of them took the democrat or AIP ballot, since those were open to NPs.

I don't think this impacted the repub outcome, but it was suspicious and brings to question, what was going on.

This was my first time at a SD poll and the supervisor was incompetent. I'll be writing a letter this week with multiple suggestions.

52 posted on 02/06/2008 9:30:22 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer
New. simplified 2008 Presidental Ballot: Choose one: [1] Satan [2] Antichrist

LOL! But that's just the DemocRAT ballot!

53 posted on 02/06/2008 9:30:31 AM PST by marinamuffy ("..pacifism ensures that cruelty will prevail on earth." - Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

Ok. So let me get this straight. The CA Republicans decided on a closed primary, but state law overrides that? So Independents could vote in the Republican primary, but they weren’t informed of this? Do I have that right?


54 posted on 02/06/2008 9:30:50 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: redstateconfidential
When I tried to reply to you, as this window opened another page jumped up to take control, with the following link addy: [ http://urlseek.vmn.net/search.php?lg=en&type=dns&tbn=vendio&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efreerepublic%2Ecom%2Ffocus%2Ff%2Dnews%2F1965899%2Freply%3Fc%3D37] but I hit 'back page' and this window then came up! Who is sabotaging FreeRepublic the last two days?

On another note, if McCain gets nominated and elected, his choice of Veep will be crucial for the nation because I do not think McCain's cancer will stay quiet long enough for him to make it for four sane years. I notice that the mainstream media crucified Fred over his less dangerous and in remission cancer but they are quiet presently over Mccain's much more dnagerous and deadly cancer which has produced noticeable swelling on the side of his face and cheek. If he gets the nomination, look for the media to amplify attention to this issue. ... That's a big hint for topic, RUSH!

55 posted on 02/06/2008 9:31:08 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: angcat

My son-in-law showed up to vote yesterday and was told that he’d already voted via absenttee, which he had not done. They allowed him to re-register and cast a provisional ballot.


56 posted on 02/06/2008 9:31:25 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
What??? I have family in SD and LA. I'm calling them to find out if they had this problem.

I live in North County SD, but I did not run into this myself. Since I voted late late there were only three other people at the polling place I go to. Did not see or hear anything myself.

57 posted on 02/06/2008 9:31:30 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer
I voting Cthulu '08! - Why vote for the LESSER evil.

Photobucket

58 posted on 02/06/2008 9:31:33 AM PST by Illuminatas (Being conservative means never having to say; "Don't you dare question my patriotism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper

Yes, I cosign what you say in my post 52.


59 posted on 02/06/2008 9:32:04 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Were those who previously were identified as “Republican” re-classified as “non-partisan”? If so, that’s outright corruption.

Yes! Exactly.


60 posted on 02/06/2008 9:32:15 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson