Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Losing my religion
New Statesman ^ | 04 February 2008 | Maryam Namazie

Posted on 02/08/2008 10:28:00 AM PST by forkinsocket

I find it slightly odd writing for a faith blog, when I don’t have any. It’s like writing for an Automobile Association blog when I take the bus.

But I do understand why it is so. In this day and age everything is framed within the context of ‘faith', especially for those of us deemed to be Muslims - no matter how clearly and loudly we profess and live otherwise. I think this is in large part due to the existence of a political Islamic movement, which strives to gain legitimacy for its terror and misogyny by claiming to represent vast number of people under the label of Muslims.

In a sense, labelling people with innumerable characteristics as Muslim and Muslim alone is part of the process of constraining them in order to feign ‘representation'. This labelling in the media, government, and mainstream society is a further capitulation, which effectively hands over millions of people - despite their never ending resistance - to this movement.

I know that the organised religion industry is on the rise everywhere and religious labelling of entire populations is becoming the norm, but with political Islam having state power in many places, and vying for power in others, it makes it a very different phenomenon. The label of Christian today is unlike the same label during the inquisition and crusades.

Correspondingly, I have only become more visible after calling myself an ex-Muslim with the establishment of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain in June 2007. Ironically, even once one has left Islam and renounced religion, one can only be visible by mentioning their former affiliation to it.

It is a huge contradiction and one which I am often asked about. Why call myself an ex-Muslim if I am an atheist? Why renounce religion publicly if I believe religion or its lack thereof must be a private affair and strictly separated from the state and educational system? Why label myself on their terms if I desire a society without labels other than human and citizen?

It is because being an ex-Muslim, or an apostate, is punishable by death in countries ruled by Islamic law; even in a place like Britain people will be surprised at the threats and intimidations those who want to leave face. Which is what makes this public renunciation crucial. It is similar to gays who came out of the closet to highlight the situation and make it easier for others to do so.

Yes, your religion or lack thereof is your business but not when you are killed for it. Then a public challenge becomes a form of resistance.

Oh yes, and why have I renounced Islam and religion? Well, I suppose if you live in a society where you can claim to be of a certain religion, choosing the bits you like, ignoring most of the rest, and just getting on with your life without it having much relevance or impact, then there may never be a need to call yourself a lapsed Christian for example.

But when the state sends a religious official to your school to ensure that you don’t mix with your friends who are boys, stops you from swimming, forces you to be veiled, hangs girls on street corners for crimes against chastity, prescribes different books for you and your girlfriends to those read by boys, and drags your loved ones away for corruption, immorality or blasphemy - you have no choice but to look at and confront it. Religion in power is very different to one that has been tamed by an enlightenment.

And why renounce all religion and not just Islam? Because in my opinion, another religion may seem better right now to some people, but it’s only because it has been reigned in.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: islam; muslims; religion
.
1 posted on 02/08/2008 10:28:02 AM PST by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Either this person believes in God or not.

If so, she should try to identify a happy religious identity. One that doesn't include blowing up innocents, or one in which it's either their way or the highway.

If she doesn't believe then it's her just screaming at the universe.

2 posted on 02/08/2008 10:45:56 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Thanks for posting. Hooray Maryam Namazie! Very good article.


3 posted on 02/08/2008 10:49:25 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Music to read this thread by...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7vs21ZKrKM


4 posted on 02/08/2008 10:53:11 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Wow, what an utter lack of understanding of the nature of different world religions, and ignorance of history.


5 posted on 02/08/2008 10:55:33 AM PST by dan1123 (McCain has an American Conservative Union rating of 82.3; Clinton has a rating of 9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
This labelling in the media, government, and mainstream society is a further capitulation, which effectively hands over millions of people - despite their never ending resistance - to this movement.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hm???,,,,Well?,,,Maybe these “millions” could start by handing over the terrorists in their midsts!

Maybe these “millions” could start by ending their deafening silence!

6 posted on 02/08/2008 11:28:26 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

I believe religion or its lack thereof must be a private affair and strictly separated from the state and educational system?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Religion and education can **never** be separated!

Axiom: It is impossible to have a religiously neutral education!

Education has highly political, cultural, moral, ethical, and values content that is never religiously neutral in content or consequences!


7 posted on 02/08/2008 11:32:55 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

“And why renounce all religion and not just Islam? Because in my opinion, another religion may seem better right now to some people, but it’s only because it has been reigned in.”

Has atheism been “reigned in” yet? You know, the “religion” behind communism, which murdered 100,000,000 people in the past century.


8 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:38 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Jesus came to make All religion obsolete.... AND DID..
"You MUST be born again" -Jesus...

Therefore its Not what you believe its WHO you are..
Its not how smart you think you are but WHO you are..
What is it to be born again?..
Now there is a question?..

9 posted on 02/08/2008 11:04:46 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson