Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reservists Comparable to Active-Duty Soldiers, Enlisted Leader Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | John J. Kruzel

Posted on 02/08/2008 3:33:56 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 8, 2008 – The Army Reserve has evolved into an operational force that is endowed with training, leadership and skills comparable to the active-duty component, the Army Reserve’s senior enlisted soldier said.

Command Sgt. Maj. Leon Caffie said he was impressed by the quality of reservists he met over the holidays in Afghanistan and Iraq, and during a massive re-enlistment ceremony in Iraq in which he participated during January.

“You can go to the theater, … and you can’t distinguish between the active-duty, National Guard or Army Reserve soldiers because that skill set and that quality is so much higher (than in the past),” he said.

Evidence of parity among Army components is an encouraging shift for Caffie, who joined the reserves after serving as an active soldier in Vietnam. The leisurely Army Reserve of yore, Caffie recalled, was a far cry from the active Army of his Vietnam service.

“I got shipped to 4th Infantry Division, which was a combat division, and I arrived via C-120,” Caffie said, describing his active-duty Vietnam deployment in a Feb. 4 interview. “The first sergeant said, ‘Here’s your weapon; there’s a rucksack down the flight pad for you.’ So I went down there, sat on that flight pad, (and the) helicopter came in late that afternoon, picked me up, (and) took me to the jungle.”

In contrast, Caffie’s recollections of the Army Reserve he entered several years later elicits memories of a military component that was akin to a social club, replete with a party planning committee and annual training that felt like summer camp.

“I tell you, it was an eye-opening experience for a person coming off active duty and going into the reserve-component unit,” Caffie told American Forces Press Service.

“Typically, you showed up for 7 o’clock formation, where they called roll. Everybody answered ‘here’ or ‘present,’” he continued. “Then they scattered like quail.”

Caffie dismissed this “legacy” Army Reserve -- with training that lasted one weekend a month in addition to two weeks of annual training -- as a strategic force that was irrelevant at best.

“You went to a military installation that you weren’t really welcome at -- it was probably more intruding than anything -- and (active-duty soldiers) tolerate you for two weeks,” Caffie said, describing annual reserve training that often depended on weapons and equipment cast off or borrowed from an active unit.

Quoting his boss, Lt. Gen. Jack C. Stultz, chief of the Army Reserve, Caffie said, “The only business that was taken care of during that two-week period was planning of the unit party on Thursday the day before you leave.

“Everybody had their directions; (we knew) who was buying beer, steaks, charcoal,” he said. “After the party, everybody loaded the car and went back home -- another successful summer camp where you really didn’t accomplish anything.”

The turning point came in the early 1990s, when Army Reserve soldiers started being mobilized into operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, Caffie said. The operations revealed an Army Reserve that was ill-equipped, poorly trained and insufficiently led.

“We had created this strategic force that was really not relevant at all. You had a bunch of numbers, but as far as training and capability, performance at that level wasn’t expected,” he said. “That changed drastically when the Army Reserve as a whole went from a strategic force to an operational force, and you have seen a significant change in how we do stuff as Army Reserve soldiers.”

In a dramatic departure from the “summer camp” era, today’s reservists have been deployed up to four times, Caffie said. Others have made significant personal sacrifices by deploying for a year at a time, he said.

“The combat experience of Army Reserve soldiers is phenomenal,” he said. “Today’s Army Reserve force is by far the best led, skilled and equipped Army Reserve I have ever been associated with.”

Despite dramatic improvements to equipment and training, Caffie said the Army Reserve’s greatest resource is the young people who “raised their hand and volunteer to serve.”

But the pool of talented young men and women is in high demand in every industrial sector, Caffie conceded. The Army Reserve not only is vying for young talent alongside other military branches, but also competes with the private and public sectors, Caffie said. Making the pursuit more difficult are strict standards placed on potential recruits. According statistics by U.S. Army Recruiting Command, of 10 potential recruits in the 17-to-42-year-old demographic, only three qualify for service. A criminal record, obesity or other eliminators can preclude service.

While the reserves ostensibly are interested in the same limited resources as other branches, Caffie suggested the best-suited members of the Army Reserve possess an extra quality.

“I think what makes a suitable Army Reserve soldier is a young person who has some goals and objectives that go beyond being active-duty military. Whether they’re going to work in an insurance company or work in their father’s or mother’s business, they’ve got some career goals other than going active duty,” he said. “Those kids make a tremendous asset for being recruited for the Army Reserve, because they maintain the community connectivity.”

In addition to holding community ties and bringing civilian-acquired skills to their military service, Caffie emphasized that Army Reserve soldiers have the same set of principles that permeates other services.

“I will put the young men and women of the U.S. Army Reserve up against any branch of the United States military,” Caffie said, “in terms of their leadership, their professionalism and their continued service.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: activeduty; reservists; soldiers

1 posted on 02/08/2008 3:33:58 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Active Duty or Reservist or National Guard. All are heroes and defend our Country!


2 posted on 02/08/2008 4:10:54 PM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Pork, just bring the hot sauce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

“I will put the young men and women of the U.S. Army Reserve up against any branch of the United States military,” Caffie said, “in terms of their leadership, their professionalism and their continued service.”

Ditto the Air Force Reserves. I am so proud of the USAFR JAGs and paralegals who VOLUNTEER to deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan I could just bust. There hasn’t been a single involuntary deployment of a reservist since 11 Sep, because volunteers have stepped up - and our Air Force folks are performing ILO duties just like the other services. The days of the weekend warrior are long gone.

Colonel, USAFR


3 posted on 02/08/2008 4:12:13 PM PST by jagusafr ("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

They’re all Joes downrange. In Uncle Ronnie’s Army it was easy to tell just by looking who was USAR and NG. Not any more.


4 posted on 02/08/2008 4:35:54 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

While it is very hard to maintain the Reserve and National Guard edge in peacetime, both because of the reduction in financial and political support, a program should be under way right now to do the next best thing:

To keep the Reserves in shape by maintaining the connectivity with the active duty military. Granted this is a formative idea, but I can imagine some components to it.

An intraweb for knowledge-based training. Everyone in the Reserve and National Guard could become part of a virtual active duty unit. Day or night they could log on to get a multimedia-heavy “active duty experience.”

Perhaps an enormous MMORPG, a Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game, like World of Warcraft, but completely oriented to active duty.

And here is the truly strange part: each individual, be they enlisted, NCO, or officer, would be playing their real world role, but virtually.

Then insert training into the “game”. For example, a National Guardsman Corporal in Utah is in the game. At some point his job is to clean his rifle. But instead of cleaning a virtual rifle, the scene changes to a video of someone cleaning a rifle in the best way possible. Not just a demo, but a real time video of cleaning every millimeter of that rifle. In the very best way it can be done.

Now this is different from a typical instructional video, that would just one patch through the barrel and say, “That’s how it’s done.” In this case, patches are run through until that barrel is *clean*. Certainly, it is less entertaining than a short video, but it fully shows how the job is done *right*.

And imagine how long the video would be showing how to do a major repair on a 5 ton truck engine? But after watching a two hour video of someone repairing a truck engine, you would *know* how to repair that truck engine.

This would be a huge project for TRADOC, but would be a huge help in keeping the Reserves in tip-top shape.

But continuous training and “virtual active duty”, MMORPG-style, might be the wave of the future in training Reserves and National Guardsmen.


5 posted on 02/08/2008 4:39:53 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“But after watching a two hour video of someone repairing a truck engine, you would *know* how to repair that truck engine.”

Told this to my Reserve son who’s a heavy equipment mechanic and he just snorted. Then he said until you’ve done hands on you don’t know anything.

Virtual reality will never be as good as the real thing.


6 posted on 02/08/2008 6:13:24 PM PST by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

I quite agree that virtual is nothing like real world, hands on experience.

However, real world, hands on experience is very, very expensive and “field” time consuming.

Instead, ask your son whether he would be more inclined to watch four two-hour videos at home in a month, whenever he wanted to; or put on his uniform and drive 20 miles to the Reserve Center and do the actual two hours of work, four times a month?

Sure, eventually that hands on work will really pay off. But until the government is willing to pay for that hands on training, it would be a lot better for him to at least be familiar with it, instead of looking at that model of truck engine for the first time.

On top of everything else, since typically he will have some training on some trucks, he will be able to pick up a lot more detail when looking at the new model of truck coming down the line.


7 posted on 02/08/2008 8:09:17 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson