Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TCats

At this point (and actually always and not just now) the primary concern should be the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY and not good of your personal platform.

Klintons are traitors - they handed keys to nuclear facilities to Chicoms and gave them missle guidance technology.

Now they want to surrender to Al Qaida.

Mac Won’t.

For me this choice is not very difficult compared to some others.


17 posted on 02/10/2008 12:33:02 AM PST by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: The_Republican; SoConPubbie; SIDENET
Your name implies you are a 'Republican'. In your post to me you suggest that I have some sort of 'Personal Platform' and further, suggest that it is at odds with 'The good of the country' and, presumably, the good of the Party.

With all due respect, I ask you to consider the proposition that it is you, and others like you, who may be taking actions that are not in the best interests of the Country or the Party. Frankly I find your insinuations about my positions and the suggestion that they are at odds with the 'Good of the Country' and the Party to be insulting, arrogant and completely unacceptable.

Again, with all the greatest respect, it is my position that it is arrogant, narrow-minded apparatchiks like you appear to be who have constructed this mess and I find it the height of hypocrisy that you, who one in one breath accuses me (And others like me) of personal motives/platforms while in the very next breath ask me (And many others who feel as I do about this) to pitch in to help fix your mess 'For the good of the Country'.

I'm not going to write more because if I do I'll probably step over a line that I do not wish to cross. I only ask that you never again post to me, or any other thinking, dedicated and, yes, Country Loving CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN INDIVIDUAL with the sort of drivel contained in your posts on this thread.

While I am happy to speak only for myself in this matter I am confident that there are very many others, perhaps a majority judging from "Mac's" miserable, minority showing in every Primary he's entered, of the Party you purportedly speak for that share a good part of my views.

You really should apologize.

23 posted on 02/10/2008 12:58:05 AM PST by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
Now they want to surrender to Al Qaida.

Mac Won’t.

At least not before he surrenders to Mexico...Gotta keep those borders open and those Mid Eastern visa's cranking out to keep the terror threat viable, right. I know I go down to the beach every day and scan the horizon for any of those invading 100hp outboard Iranian speed destroyers. We're rule by fear here doncha know.

I think China is just sitting back laughing at us now. They know we have kicked a tarbaby. At least when when Reagan kicked it he had enough sense to extricate us from it...What was it he said? "Mid East Politics are insane."

Word to the idiot neocons and Rockefeller Pubs who believe we can export our brand of democracy to the ME and worldwide at gun point. You failed to take into account the religious factor in the targeted countries in the ME just as you did when you advised Clinton on the Balkins. Republican Democracy is plainly incompatible with a theocratic social order. Especially an Islamic theocracy. Your secular perspective blinders you to this fact...

26 posted on 02/10/2008 1:06:38 AM PST by KDD (Freedom begins between the ears. -- Edward Abbey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: The_Republican
the primary concern should be the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY and not good of your personal platform.

Sure, it would be good for the country if Bush-41 disn't lose to Clinton in 1992, it would be good for the country if GOP didn't decide to nominate Bob Dole in 1996 trying to win on "liberal, liberal, liberal" Clinton's "bogeyman", it would be good for the country if Bush-41 and Bush-43 could intelligently and passionately explain what the heck they were doing even when they were doing the right thing for the country, instead of using webs ites like FR, blogosphere or talk show hosts to try and interpret it for them; it would be good for the country if GOP elites at this important time didn't once again decided to stick it to their "base" and tried to shut down and defeat conservatives by setting up the process in the way as to help nominating one of the worst and least acceptable candidates in the party on the principle of "where are they going to go now?", ignoring completely what happened in 2006.

If GOP elite doesn't care about what would be good for the country, why do we have to think that by trying to help GOP win, we are doing what would be good for the country, and not what would be good for the GOP elites...

I have LESS than ZERO faith in John McCain doing anything that would be good for the country, and not what would be good for the himself, as he kept proving it vindictively and almost sadistically throughout the years.

And it doesn't make me in the least happy to say this.

27 posted on 02/10/2008 1:06:56 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson