Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red-light Camera Violations Go Unpunished(Orange Co.,CA: 25K violaters)
orange county register ^ | February 10, 2008 | JENNIFER MUIR

Posted on 02/10/2008 6:34:59 AM PST by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Mogollon
"Hey..the government ignores the illegals when they break our laws. Why can’t we ignore laws we don’t like??"

I have made that point many times - we're surrounded by illegals living their lives as scofflaws and of course that trashes our respect for the law.

21 posted on 02/10/2008 7:21:17 AM PST by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Man! Was I ill informed!

Seems these tickets/'points'/YEARLY FINES are money making scams for many states these days.

Here in TX my hubby just found out he's been convicted on ONE PART of a year old ticket (without any notice).

After 'holding' for 30 min. for DPS in Austin, I was basically told in ONE min......

"To Bad a 'mistake' was made, we cannot remove the points & fines you MUST pay for the next 3 years."

22 posted on 02/10/2008 7:23:04 AM PST by txdoda (Voters to Gov't .......Re: post 9-11 Border Security....... ""The results are Unacceptable."")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

“So who do they ticket?

We have four drivers in our family.”

From the article:

When there is no age or gender match in San Diego, police can either discard the ticket or investigate further to see if they can identify who was driving. Sometimes they’ll compare the red light runner’s photo with DMV photos of other people living in the same house, San Diego Police Sgt. Joe Bane said.

“We don’t send it to court unless you match the photo,” Bane said. “They’re very stringent in the courts as far as what can be filed.”

But in Orange County and several others jurisdictions across the state, the court doesn’t require police to verify that the person in the photo is the person ticketed. The vehicle code doesn’t require it, Slater says.

Instead, the ticket packet mailed to each motorist includes a form asking the car’s owner to identify the person who was driving. Giving up the real driver is not required by law, despite what the paperwork implies. The court expects that motorists will appear before a judge if they’re not the person pictured. The judge can decide whether the person standing in the courtroom looks like the person in the photo.


23 posted on 02/10/2008 7:23:29 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“I would think that if you cannot face and cross examine your accuser, then you cannot be found guilty.”

Think again...

Just like any crime...if there is video evidence of you doing the crime, you can be convicted and expect a penalty.

Except in Orange County.LOL


24 posted on 02/10/2008 7:27:17 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I have a policy to resist speed-cameras. I go 30 MPH at all times in localities that use such disgusting, fund raising measures.

By the way, the proper speed limit has been proven again and again to be the average of all cars using any stretch of road. It's true. Speed limits are set way too low by governments to raise money through fines, and to avoid liability from bottom feeding lawyers in accident related lawsuits.

Fight back.

25 posted on 02/10/2008 7:29:05 AM PST by Rapscallion (I would rather eat rotten meat than ingratiate myself with liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

It’s all about fund-raising, not public safety. Most of these intersections could be made safer by simply retiming the lights, but the authorities don’t want to end the cash cow.

Don’t pay any ticket that was not served on you personally, or served by certified mail.


26 posted on 02/10/2008 7:41:24 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
California is loaded with laws that go unenforced. Leftists love 'em.

(1) If they pass a law, they get credit for caring--nevermind that the law doesn't solve any problem, makes a problem where there wasn't one, or makes an existing problem worse--the morons who make up the rank and file of the Leftist movement think that passing a law and--above all--caring does something good...

(2) A huge number of cumbersome laws makes selective enforcement easy. Leftists LOVE tyrants, and this empowers countless petty and grand tyrants who can enforce the laws arbitrarily--not punishing transgressions by those they like, throwing the book at those they don't like.

Leftists LOVE laws "WITH TEEETH IN THEM!" (viz. draconial laws) that they can enforce selectively!

27 posted on 02/10/2008 7:45:58 AM PST by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon

Why can’t we ignore laws we don’t like?


There is a difference between ignoring a law (red-light-running) and ignoring a ticket from a corrupt and ineffectual system (inadequately served photo-tickets.)


28 posted on 02/10/2008 7:46:33 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Like many, I not only paid for the ticket and the cost of attending traffic school but spent a whole Saturday attending traffic school just to supposedly keep the violation off my driving record. Man! Was I ill informed!

You think any illegal alien showed up?
You should have imitated them
Next time tell them --Yo hablo Espanol

29 posted on 02/10/2008 7:49:30 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Safety is not a factor to the red light cam faction. MONEY is!


30 posted on 02/10/2008 7:55:35 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Meanwhile, the drivers who face up to their mistake and respond to their tickets face a $346 fine, driving school and sometimes, a spike in their insurance rates.

Holy carp! All that for one red light run?

There is a red light cam near me. I was in a hurry and thought I could scoot through on yellow, but the car in front of me stopped and sat there for several seconds before making a right turn, leaving me in the middle of the intersection when the light turned red. I was pushing it, and I take responsibility for that.

I got a ticket in the mail, accompanied by a photo of my tag, my car, and my face, since I drive a convertible -- no getting around that. It cost me $50.

Few jurisdictions send cops to knock on people's doors for a single delinquent traffic ticket -- they send notice by mail. Rack up enough, and you get additional penalties; rack up more and they get a warrant for failure to appear. Again, it's not a high enough priority for them to send officers to execute the warrant, but it's in the system, and you're nailed the next time you get pulled over or need to renew your license.

My reading is that the problem is that the tickets aren't going into the system. Meaning that if a motorist has 20 unpaid tickets, the cop won't know that when he writes another one. That is a problem.

31 posted on 02/10/2008 8:05:42 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud

OC California has made it far more onerous to obey the law than to ignore it when it comes to traffic laws.

This has implications for those willing to see them.


32 posted on 02/10/2008 8:10:38 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

“Holy carp! All that for one red light run?”

That’s right...in Orange county that is...
of course, since they are not enforcing the camera violaters...who cares! LOL


33 posted on 02/10/2008 8:11:12 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

These cameras are DANGEROUS.

They should be illegal.

Cops should be required to pass a donut-consumption test.

If it can’t eat a donut, it can’t write a ticket!

Seriously not only are red light cameras profoundly Big Brotherish, they are dangerous. They’re put in busy intersections on streets with relatively high speed limits.

People zoom along, then *immediately* upon the yellow light, slam on their brakes.

Some legal firm, should specialize in the ensuing accidents, and go after the municipalities.


34 posted on 02/10/2008 8:16:20 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Draft: Condoleezza Rice for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
They ticket the person whose name is on the title no matter who is driving.

The systems I've seen also take a shot through the windshield. If it's clearly not you driving, you can go to court and contest the fine -- or you can go to court and sue the person who got the fine for you.

It works the other way around sometimes. I bought my uncle a car so he could take care of my grandmother. It's registered and insured in my name. I failed to get the tag updated in time, and he got pulled over and ticketed. The ticket was in his name, but it was my fault, so I did the menschy thing and paid it.

In most cases, it will take a lot more time, effort and money to fight a ticket than to just pay up. That is the way traffic offenses are stacked -- due process is available, so the courts won't overturn it, but there are so many hurdles that 99% of drivers will simply pay the fine.

A few years ago, I got my first-ever speeding ticket in the city of Atlanta. 56 in a 35. Right at the razor's edge, because 20 mph over the limit gives you two points instead of one, a much bigger fine, and a ding on your insurance.

My plan was to go to traffic court and basically try to strike a plea bargain, pleading to 19 over the limit, to reduce the damage. I consulted a lawyer friend, who said that it would likely work and definitely wouldn't hurt. I could show the judge my driving record with no previous speeding tickets and throw myself on the mercy of the court.

So I went to traffic court. When my case was called, the cop who wrote the ticket wasn't there, so it was dismissed and I walked out scot free. Many, if not most, police departments are too stretched to have officers sitting around waiting to testify for a minor traffic offense.

The cop will show up if it's DUI, more serious offenses like reckless driving, or if there's an accident. That was my observation as I waited for my case to be called.

35 posted on 02/10/2008 8:23:42 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
And then it is the responsibility of the owner to prove that they were not driving the vehicle and designate who was.

Innocent until proven guilty, sir.
Not the other way around. - Actually, these types of tickets bother me immensely.

36 posted on 02/10/2008 8:44:07 AM PST by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

>They ticket the person whose name is on the title no matter who is driving.<

When a business owns the car .........


37 posted on 02/10/2008 8:50:06 AM PST by B4Ranch (("Life is a food chain; if you're not at the top, you're on the menu." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Here in Stanislaus county (Ca.) they simpy suspend your DL for failure to appear and issue a bench warrant for your arrest. Then if you are pulled over for anything and they check for “wants and warrants” you are promptly arrested and your vehicle impounded. Something so “minor” now becomes a major financial burden.


38 posted on 02/10/2008 9:24:26 AM PST by enuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; Dark Wing
The legal error here is that a criminal penalty is involved, but there often is no evidence of who the driver was. So they demand that people incriminate themselves.

This is SOO vulnerable to a constitutional challenge.

39 posted on 02/10/2008 10:23:39 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Something is wrong there - the laws I have read say the you may not enter the intersection AFTER the light turns red. That means that if any part of the vehicle is over the limit line when the light goes red you are ok. You may enter the intersection when the light is yellow and if it turns red while you are in the intersection you did not enter when it was red. A good example is when you are making a left turn, you have entered the intersection but must wait for the traffic to clear, you cannot be ticked for waiting to safely pass through. the right turn you describe is the same example.


40 posted on 02/10/2008 12:10:00 PM PST by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson