Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Brightside

They are supposed to ticket the owner of the vehicle.
And then it is the responsibility of the owner to prove that they were not driving the vehicle and designate who was.

Of course, if the cities aren’t processing the tickets as they have not been doing...all of this is inconsequential.LOL


19 posted on 02/10/2008 7:08:28 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kellynla
And then it is the responsibility of the owner to prove that they were not driving the vehicle and designate who was.

Innocent until proven guilty, sir.
Not the other way around. - Actually, these types of tickets bother me immensely.

36 posted on 02/10/2008 8:44:07 AM PST by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
So, if I am accused, the burden is on me to prove that I am not guilty?

In every other court in this land, it is the other way around. The burden is on the accuser to prove that I AM guilty.

44 posted on 02/11/2008 6:08:09 AM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson