A most impressive article. Kudos for doing the research. It’s wonderful to catch the libs in their weakest point...science. One of the many mysteries of the universe is how a group so completely ignorant of so many things can fake expertise. In addition, I am befuddled by those in the science community that appear to go along....just to insure funding for their project. Such callousness approaches that of the Clintons.
The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.
—RONALD REAGAN
The war against science exists on four fronts. The first two are by the left and by the right. But the other two are just as deadly.
The third war against scientists is by scientists that are poor scientists. The fourth war by unethical scientists.
To explain the wars, it is necessary to describe science like a game of chess. It has very precise rules, and if you do not follow the rules, you have not done science or chess, even if you use test tubes, in one case, or a chess board and pieces in another.
Just as importantly, and still using the analogy, if you have conducted a scientific experiment by the rules, then that is *all* you have done. If you play a game of chess, then *all* you have done is play a game of chess. Neither science or chess can be interpolated or extrapolated. Doing so violates the rules.
As a comparative example, say you conduct a scientific experiment to demonstrate the existence of gravity. Once you have done so, under the strict rules of science, you have conducted an experiment. If you say that gravity even exists outside of that experiment, it is not science, it is extrapolation.
It may be true, and it may be very reasonable, but it is not science, it is something else. This is because it is outside of the rules. From the same perspective, if you play a game of chess, and you lose your queen, it does not indicate that Queen Elizabeth II is about to abdicate or die. Even if she does. This is because it has nothing to do with the game, or the rules of chess. It is something different.
The first war against science, by the left, is an effort to seize the credibility of science and co-opt it to advance a political agenda.
The second war against science, by the right, shows both a lack of faith in religious beliefs, and a belief in science. Or really a belief in what has been extrapolated from science, not science itself, using scientific rules. The right is intimidated by science so much, that it coins its beliefs into scientific terms; but with no validity, as it does not follow the rules of science.
And this leads into the third war against science, by poor scientists. They either do not understand, do not appreciate, or refuse to abide by the rules of science, yet mask their efforts to make them appear to be scientific. This has a very erosive effect on the cumulative increase in scientific knowledge. Bricks made of unfired clay, that eventually will crumble, weakening the science built on this foundation.
The fourth, and by far, the most dangerous war against science is waged by the unethical scientists. It is not just refusing the ethical limits of Dr. Frankenstein, but in actively trying to transcend such limits. And while they often follow the rules of science properly, their experiments are inhumane, destructive, insidious, and often downright evil.
Such scientists proclaim that there should be no barrier to scientific inquiry, even if it should cause untold harm, or even destroy the world itself. And this makes them the biggest threat to science at all.