Posted on 02/10/2008 12:44:36 PM PST by beejaa
This is true. Many Democrats liked Reagan in spite of his fierce oppostion to their positions, Democrats only like McCain because of his adoption of their positions.
And here we are, what, 22 years later?
I'm one who thinks we're actually going to get something done on this. The American public is fed-up with this issue.
The Dems are energized. We are disspirited and divided. No way a candidate as divisive as McCain can unify the party. Even if we would all do the nose holding routine at the ballot box again, he’s cooked. I’m not holding my nose for such an awful candidate.
I still remember the GOP telling us that Bob Dole was the most electable candidate in 1996. Dole is going to lok like a steamroller compared to McManiac.
More common-sense quit-whining talk from a conservative columnist:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/who_wants_to_be_a_loser.html
February 10, 2008
Who Wants to be a Loser?
By Debra Saunders
There are elements in the Republican Party who are trying to turn the GOP into the victim party. No matter how much they’ve won, they want to see themselves as losers.
An e-mail I received from a reader summed up the resentment that has been bubbling up all over the GOP. She had liked Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter as GOP hopefuls and didn’t know if she would vote for John McCain.
“I began to rethink my allegiance to the Republican Party last summer with the immigration reform bill after party leaders told the rank and file to screw themselves,” she wrote. “I do not object to Republican leadership having a collegial relationship with Democrats. What I object to is that they always get hosed when they ‘compromise’ in the ‘spirit of bipartisanship.’ Bipartisanship, by definition of the Dems and the media, is doing it the Democrat way. Ronald Reagan, when explaining his departure from the Dem Party, said he didn’t leave the party so much as the party left him.”
I’ve received many e-mails with the same sentiment. It’s odd that those very voters, whose outrage obliterated the immigration bill (which contained amnesty provisions), somehow feel as if they lost that battle.
But they won. They killed the bill. Twice. McCain now promises to secure the borders before proposing a path to citizenship. Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton says that she opposes driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants. The Bush administration has beefed up deportation of “immigration fugitives,” (illegal immigrants in violation of deportation orders) and is going after employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
Bipartisanship means Democrats win? In 2006, Democrats took over Congress. Yet because President Bush has not backed down on Iraq, the Nancy Pelosi-led House and Harry Reid-led Senate are funding the war — including the troop surge, which Democrats opposed.
Washington has not made the Bush tax cuts permanent, but the cuts are still on the books and in Americans’ wallets. Bush promised to work with Democrats on an economic stimulus package. He wanted tax rebates for taxpayers and tax cuts for businesses. Democrats wanted “rebates” for those who don’t pay income taxes, an extension for unemployment benefits and increased subsidies for heating assistance and food stamps. Last week, Democrats agreed to a package that gave Bush what he wanted. While they won smaller rebates for those who pay no income tax, as well as payments for seniors and disabled veterans, the Dems didn’t get the Christmas tree they wanted.
Congressional Democrats thought they had Bush in a corner when they passed a $35 billion expansion in federal funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Bush vetoed the bill, then vetoed a second bill. He insists that eligibility be limited to children in families that earn no more than 2 1/2 times the poverty level.
Here’s another biggie: After eight years in which President Bill Clinton nominated big-government justices, Bush managed to place two solid conservatives — not conservatives in name only — in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Bush is a lame duck whom the left has written off as hopelessly stupid — yet he still manages to command Beltway policy — despite a Democratic majority. Indeed, Democratic leaders, who once thought they were so smart, now look feckless before partisans who were convinced a Democratic Congress would force Bush to pull out U.S. troops from Iraq and show the world an America that cuts and runs when the going gets tough.
Still, some conservatives want to believe that they get no respect, that their side isn’t getting anywhere. Like Democrats, they want to be victims. They can always wait until 2009. Then they just might find out what not getting their way really means.
“You did put on your asbestos suit, right?”
My fire extinguisher is at hand.
Right wing extremists
ideologues.
It's amazing how these McCain supporters now classify the conservative movement.
However, the very fact that the article is being written demonstrates the falsity of its contention. By definition, an extremist is a tiny minority (otherwise he or she wouldn't be an extremist). Political parties have never needed or even wanted extremist among them and they have never had any impact on a election. The very fact that so many McCain supporters are trying so hard to split the conservative movement shows that the anti McCain group is quite large and hardly extreme at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.