Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F15Eagle
Obama is worse than Hillary

This is true. However Obama is also so far left and so inexperienced that I think even some Dems in congress might block him in a lot of things. Obama being the most liberal might actually cause less damage then Hillary because of this.

85 posted on 02/10/2008 3:43:18 PM PST by Domandred (McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Domandred; F15Eagle

Obama is preferable because his opponent is coming to the end of a thirty-year plan to seize power and rule with an iron fist. There are literally thousands of regulators-in-waiting and judges-in-waiting, hand picked by Her Thighness, ready to overturn 220 years of Constitutional government and rule like Stalinists.

I have no illusions about Senator Obama - his ideas are every bit as bad as hers.

But he is not at the head of a revolutionary long-term project with international connections and thousands of ready-to-go commissars. She is.

If Obama is elected, powerful countervailing forces will oppose him and his own inexperience and probable incompetence will limit the damage. The President, alone, is not a dictator.

Hillary’s administration-in-waiting is a clear and present danger to the republic. Young Senator Obama, IMO, is not.


92 posted on 02/10/2008 3:47:26 PM PST by Jim Noble (Look out kid, they keep it all hid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson