"if you think any President LEADER would dream of beginning their term without the possibility and the ability for compromise, then you are...WRONG
"if you think any President would dream of LEAD, from the beginning of their term, without the possibility and the ability for compromise, then you are...WRONG
I have simplified in as many ways as I can, in order that you may, perhaps grasp what I have said.
Further condensing...simply because someone is willing to compromise does not mean they approach every situation/person/issue announcing, "I am here to compromise, how may I compromise. I LEAD by compromising"...and if that is what you are attempting to say with your weak link traitor gobble de goo in your original argument, then that is senselessly inept.
Temper termper. Read your own tagline. Then while you are condescending down to my lowly level, show me where I said what you accuse me of saying. No, I went out of my way to specifically say when it was appropriate to compromise and when it was not appropriate. You are the one who got mad at some statement I didn’t even make. Your tagline says politics are about compromise. So I was addressing the issue of compromise, when it is good and when it is not good. Compromise is not in and of itself good. Otherwise traitors are good.