NE Tarrant County. Near Keller.
Now, the "logic" behind my candidate selection:
(1). Conventional wisdom (whatever that is) says Hillary is the easiest for a Republican to beat.
(2). Hillary in a general election for POTUS would be a whole lot easier for the conservatives to attack than an "Afro-American" as Hillary is finding out the hard way. So, why go through that?
(3). Hillary will be a whole lot more FUN to campaign against.
(4). My daughter (who is a staunch conservative and whom I love very much - and raised correctly) hates McCain and says she will vote for Obama (only in the primary, though)! I have to cancel out her vote, hehehehe!
The conventional wisdom is wrong.
The corrupt clintons have a plan to win the general. It is probably the same plan they used the last time. Run a conservative third party candidate to split our vot.
If she wins the primary, there is a very good chance she wins the general. They don’t need to peel off many voters given how evenly divided the country has been.
Furthermore, you put her on the air for another year plus you allow her to raise a couple hundred million for her to play with and spend. Help get her off the air now.
As for which would be harder to defeat. Race or Gender? You are forgetting that her ‘gender’ is in the majority. The identity voters will be in a tizzy either way.
H is having trouble because she has deliberately trashed and dissed the African American voting group. Remember, she was leading in that community until just before Super T.