So, it is not private property.
I didn't ask if it was "private property", I asked if the school "owned" the property.
If the state "owns" the property then the state should have the largest say on what is allowed on the property.
If the state is represented by the people creating this ban then, so be it.
We can't have it both ways. We want a private property owner to have the say what happens on their property but if the government, state/county/municiple, owns the property we don't want them to have the say?
I don't like that the state restricts liberties, especially with a legal product, BUT...