Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/12/2008 8:04:01 AM PST by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TornadoAlley3

Huckabee’s right...not that Huckabee can do any better.


2 posted on 02/12/2008 8:05:57 AM PST by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

But he’s got a great ability to alienate it.


3 posted on 02/12/2008 8:06:08 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

Is it even a question anymore?

The real question is: can Huckabee do any better?


4 posted on 02/12/2008 8:06:08 AM PST by Def Conservative (In the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade-John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3
The former governor did rule out a third party bid...

Hmmm. Didn't see THAT one coming...

5 posted on 02/12/2008 8:06:30 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Vote for McCain! Mental health is overrated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

I question his ability to energize anything.


7 posted on 02/12/2008 8:08:02 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3
Huckabee is having a hard time energizng anybody who does not speak with a southern drawl and/or play Golf on Sunday morning instead of going to church.

California-- 12% (Half million votes behind Romney)
Colorado -- 13%
Connecticut --7%
Maine --6%
Massachusetts --4%
Montana 15% -- He finished BEHIND Ron Paul
Nevada 8% -- Behind Ron Paul
New Hampshire -- 11%
New Jersey --8%
New York -- 11%
North Dakota -- 20% Behind Ron Paul
Utah --2% Behind Ron Paul

<>Mike Huckabee came in BEHIND Ron Paul in 4 states. ,b>
8 posted on 02/12/2008 8:08:59 AM PST by elizabetty (Mike Huckabee for President of the Confederate States of America -- Bad for the UNION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3
"There’s a greater chance that I would dye my hair green, cover my body with tattoos and go on a rock tour with Amy Winehouse."

Now there's a great campaign promise. I think I'd like the guy with a lessor chance of doing those things. ;-)

11 posted on 02/12/2008 8:13:40 AM PST by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3
Sad when the “presumptive” nominee is having to fight for every vote he’s getting. He probably was looking forward to time at the house in AZ. There goes those plans.
17 posted on 02/12/2008 8:22:23 AM PST by Sybeck1 (You trust this joker on the Supreme Court? He did vote to confirm Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3
Huckabee knows better than to even THINK about running against Senator Mark Pryor.

"If you can't beat 'em, maybe another option?""

Sunday, Jan 20, 2008

By David Sanders

When word got out this week that Sen. Mark Pryor wouldn't face the threat of a creditable Republican opponent, thanks, in part, to state Republican Party chairman Dennis Milligan's discouraging would-be challengers in his party from running against the first-term Democrat, it elicited a few responses from yours truly.

Simply on the surface, it appears that Milligan is derelict in his duties, which includes recruiting quality Republican candidates. His justification, best I can tell, is that putting up someone to challenge Pryor, who is widely considered unbeatable, might provide extra incentive for Democrats to work harder this year. Republicans don't want that, especially since Arkansas figures to be a target state in the upcoming presidential contest.

But is sitting out the race the only option for Republicans?

This election year has already provided numerous ups and downs - frankly, at times it has seemed like up is down and down is up. What was predicted to happen in the presidential primaries hasn't gone according to plan.

Since things are so unpredictable only weeks into 2008, there is always a possibility, albeit small, that the popular anti-Washington-we-need-a-change sentiment driving this presidential campaign, might, at some point, proliferate through the electorate and affect key senatorial and congressional contests, rendering vulnerable politicians who were once considered a lock for re-election.

That said, someone would have to be willing to run, to take advantage of such a future electoral ethos, but it appears the well is dry. No Republican of any stature is willing to challenge Pryor.

So I've come full circle - this isn't all Milligan's fault. In fact, fending off any serious challenge is a testament to Pryor's ability. He has avoided toeing the Democratic line in spite of some very serious divisions between the two parties.

During his five years in the Senate, he has carved out some positions that are indistinguishable from some of the Republicans running for president. That doesn't mean those positions were always preferred or acceptable. It's merely a qualitative appraisal of a record Pryor's staff likes to highlight these days.

In terms of the war in Iraq, Pryor went against his party, voting against a resolution to pull the troops out and another plan containing a defined timeline for a troop withdrawal. Pryor pushed a plan to leave Iraq, but with a "secret" pull-out date. For a while last year, Mitt Romney was supportive of Pryor's secret withdrawal.

He voted for the Patriot Act, which puts him in line with every Republican except Ron Paul.

After he voted for the ban on partial-birth abortion, he voted against a resolution affirming Roe v. Wade as the law of the land. This places him to the right of Rudy Giuliani and more in line with pro-life Republicans like Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson, and others. (According to National Right to Life, Pryor's most recent votes on pro-life issues leave a lot to be desired.)

Pryor and Sen. John McCain teamed up together on the so-called "Gang of 14" to prevent a Senate meltdown over judicial appointments. They prevented Republicans from using the "nuclear option" to break the Democrats' filibuster, but they also cleared the way for many of Bush's nominees to receive a vote on the Senate floor.

Last summer, Pryor voted against his friend McCain to block the controversial immigration reform bill backed by the White House and Democratic leaders. In the past, Pryor had supported measures more friendly to illegal immigrants, which puts him in good company. Both Giuliani and Huckabee have now taken a hard line (to varying degrees) on illegal immigration, but in their previous jobs, both men supported pro-illegal immigrate policies.

Pryor voted to protect gun manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits and against a bill that would have outlawed a significant amount of gun ammunition as well as other bills supporting the Second Amendment, which puts him in line with Huckabee and Thompson, but to the right of Giuliani and Romney.

Milligan told The Associated Press that the 2006 Democratic sweep set Arkansas Republicans back 20 years. Since Arkansas' junior Democratic senator is getting a pass from Republicans and given the fact that he's been fairly conservative (comparatively speaking), Milligan and his party cohorts could, in the spirit of bipartisanship, consider Pryor for the GOP nomination. They have nothing to lose and are desperate to win.

------- David Sanders writes twice weekly for the Arkansas News Bureau in Little Rock and is a host of the Arkansas Education Television Network's "Unconventional Wisdom." His e-mail address is DavidJSanders@aol.com.

20 posted on 02/12/2008 8:40:37 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

Well, we’re energized, but just not the way the RNC hoped we’d be...


24 posted on 02/12/2008 9:24:17 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

When Republicans carry the South, they tend to win. When Dems pick up a few southern states, the Reps always lose. McCain has been losing in way too many Southern states.


25 posted on 02/12/2008 9:36:14 AM PST by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; MeekOneGOP; gonzo

26 posted on 02/12/2008 9:54:07 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

“Republicans are not going to be elected because they carried Delaware, Connecticut, New York and California,” Huckabee said, referring to some of the states McCain has won. He added that the question is whether the Arizonan will be “able to energize the base of the party in a way that will get the foot soldiers out.”

Huckabee has a strong point. During those months when Giuliani had a big lead over all Republican hopefuls, I often commented that blue states want to nominate a candidate that red states will have to elect.

Well, that’s what we’ve got, only the mostly blue states are nominating McCain, and the red states will have to provide probably 80% or more of the support for him to have a chance to win. Anyone counting on New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey and California going for McCain in November??

This scenario is inevitable as the country club Republicans try to gain greater influence in the party.


27 posted on 02/12/2008 10:15:28 AM PST by Will88 ( The Worst Case Scenario: McCain with a Dhimm majority in the House and Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TornadoAlley3

How can you believe anything that cultist the huckster says?


32 posted on 02/12/2008 11:05:20 AM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson