Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Ignores Losses, Gets Booed
Captain's Quarters ^ | Feb. 13, 2008 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/13/2008 7:00:20 AM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last
To: kabar
Hillary will turn out conservatives, many of whom [not me], will hold their noses and vote for McCain. If Obama is the nominee, they won't. I base that on the reaction my newly formed group, Republicans Against Maverick McCain, got during the CPAC conference. Most who signed up said they wouldn't vote for McCain under any circumstance.

Just to point out ... that's a pretty self-selecting sample, from which you probably can't make any valid general predictions.

I think just as many conservatives -- i.e., most of us -- will turn out to vote for McCain regardless of whether Obama or Hillary is the nominee.

Because, you see, most conservatives, being thinking beings, realize the alternative to McCain is far, far worse; and we choose not to let our own personal hissy fits get in the way of our reason, or the good of the nation.

101 posted on 02/13/2008 8:53:58 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

Are the ballots secret?

I can’t imagine the Rats would want to go through this anymore than most Republicans do.


102 posted on 02/13/2008 8:54:23 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Reading the description it wasn’t Hillary that got booed. It was her mentioning of Obama.


103 posted on 02/13/2008 8:56:25 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

El Paso


104 posted on 02/13/2008 8:57:31 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

As a talk show host said....Hillary...”the Tonya Harding of Politics”.....will NEVER let a BLACK GUY beat them!!


105 posted on 02/13/2008 8:59:59 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

As a talk show host said....Hillary...”the Tonya Harding of Politics”.....will NEVER let a BLACK GUY beat them!!


106 posted on 02/13/2008 9:00:02 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Obama beat Hillary in the Hispanic vote last night by 10 points.
107 posted on 02/13/2008 9:00:10 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Not really secret.

If you are familiar with what happens in the House when the floor managers are pushing a bill through, you will find that the conventions are similar. They will argue, and take sides, sometimes switching to give one candidate more strength, until someone emerges as the clear winner. Then everyone jumps on board the train.

108 posted on 02/13/2008 9:03:41 AM PST by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

thx for the new tagline. Had to modify it to fit.


109 posted on 02/13/2008 9:07:06 AM PST by sauropod (Will Hillary bring the silver back to the Whitehouse, or is this all about finishing up the set?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul; Eye of Unk

Kudos where kudos are due.


110 posted on 02/13/2008 9:12:35 AM PST by sauropod (Will Hillary bring the silver back to the Whitehouse, or is this all about finishing up the set?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

It’s public.


111 posted on 02/13/2008 9:14:10 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Just to point out ... that's a pretty self-selecting sample, from which you probably can't make any valid general predictions.

I am not making any predictions, but I can say that after being at CPAC for three days, which is attended by really hardcore conservatives, McCain should be very worried about support from us. You can't be the party maverick thumbing your nose at conservatives and then expect them to support you in the general election just because you are attracting 31% of the Rep vote prior to yesterday's primaries.

I think just as many conservatives -- i.e., most of us -- will turn out to vote for McCain regardless of whether Obama or Hillary is the nominee.

I don't know what you are basing that statement on or how much you mean by "most." If only 10% or 15% of Reps refuse to vote for McCain, he will be a dead man walking.

Because, you see, most conservatives, being thinking beings, realize the alternative to McCain is far, far worse; and we choose not to let our own personal hissy fits get in the way of our reason, or the good of the nation.

If you are implying that I am not a thinking being or that I am not voting for McCain because I am having a hissy fit, you are wrong. If John McCain can vote on the basis of principle and conscience, so can I.

My issue is amnesty. I believe if passed, the country is finished. Once done, it can't be undone. I have invested a lot of time and effort fighting the passage of amnesty over several years. John McCain has fought us every step of the way including voting for amnesty in 2006 [S. 2611] and 2007. In the McCain-Kennedy bill, McCain and a small cabal of senators met in secret and drafted a bill, bypassed the normal committee process, tried to block all amendments to the bill, and tried to force and up or down vote in just a matter of days. So much for the democratic process.

How can I vote for someone like that, especially if I believe that his position will destroy the country? Why should I be complicit? I will vote, but not for the office of President. I will vote a straight Rep ticket, as always, but I will not vote for President. I just can't do it as a matter of honor and principle.

112 posted on 02/13/2008 9:15:07 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: kabar
If you are implying that I am not a thinking being or that I am not voting for McCain because I am having a hissy fit, you are wrong.

Let's just say that I'm not IMPLYING anything, sir. You ARE having a hissy fit, and it is interfering with your reason.

On your signature issue, the alternative to McCain is WORSE, whether it's Obama or Clinton. Your "revenge" on McCain ends up being hurting you more than if you behaved like a responsible citizen.

113 posted on 02/13/2008 9:23:28 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SlapHappyPappy

Hmm.

I wonder how that plays with the ‘Toons.

OTOH, it allows for them to work some kind of intimidation on the delegates.

OTOH, it opens them up to public humiliation and repudiation of historical proportions.


114 posted on 02/13/2008 9:27:43 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RC2

“obama will go down in front of the clinton machine...”

you said it.


115 posted on 02/13/2008 9:27:56 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I agree.


116 posted on 02/13/2008 9:29:51 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: jdm
She talked about George Bush and Barack Obama being "all hat and no cattle,"
Happy trails to you, Hillary. Happy trails to you.

And here's hoping that we never, ever meet again.

Man is it good to see her fade into the sunset.

117 posted on 02/13/2008 9:30:17 AM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

She is “all kankle and no ankle”.


118 posted on 02/13/2008 9:32:52 AM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdm
The superdelegates represent the elected and appointed establishment of the party. The Clintons have spent the last sixteen years putting most of them in power. They have campaigned for them, raised cash for them, and gotten them their jobs. Most of them are superdelegates because of the Clintons in one way or another.
BFD.

Does anyone really think all those corrupt pols that the Clintons pushed into power have any sense of LOYALTY?

Does anyone think they care about the PAST?

They're all looking to their future, man, the future of what side their bread is buttered on, just like the craven Clintons themselves. And if those pols see a future of incomparable brightness and Obama, that's who they'll vote for baby.

It's asta la vista, Clintons. Your fellow rats don't need you anymore.

119 posted on 02/13/2008 9:36:58 AM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Question: do the superdelegates vote in public or by secret ballot?
I don't think there are any secret ballots at a party convention.
120 posted on 02/13/2008 9:41:13 AM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson