1 posted on
02/13/2008 7:10:05 PM PST by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
No, we need to euthanize 80% of the world’s population. </s>
2 posted on
02/13/2008 7:15:32 PM PST by
Rob112586
("...a decrease in the quantity of legislation generally means an increase in the quality of life.")
To: Lorianne
The obvious solution is if all the liberals who are so concerned about overpopulation would just leave the problem would be solved.
3 posted on
02/13/2008 7:15:38 PM PST by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: Lorianne
20 years ago the world was going to collapse from the “population bomb.” That is now downgraded to the “middle class explosion” — so we should take comfort that the worst crisis the Los Angeles times (intentionally lower case) can muster is too many “un-poor.”
4 posted on
02/13/2008 7:17:16 PM PST by
bajabaja
To: Lorianne
So, if there's upward mobility in the economic classes across the world, what is Obama's senate bill about then?
You know the one that would cost us .07% (about $90Bil) of our GDP anually and be administered by the UN... the one that gets voted on tomorrow...
5 posted on
02/13/2008 7:17:56 PM PST by
infidel29
(Santorum 2012..)
To: Lorianne
The socialist mind at work.
You can’t explain the world with the “conflict theory” and that is what feminists, socialists and others attempts to do. These people believe ultimately that one group can be on top only because it holds another group down, and so flows the reasoning out of this article. Complete utter BS from the mind of an idiot that read to much Marx.
6 posted on
02/13/2008 7:19:40 PM PST by
Red6
(Come and take it.)
To: Lorianne
If the liberals are all for social equality and increased prosperity, as they claim to be, then why does the headline ominously read "Can the world afford a growing middle class?"
The answer is, yes it can. Humans use mathematics, science, and technology (more generally, reason and rational thought) to improve the quality and the quantity of life for everyone. Unfortunately, the liberals tend to be a few cents short of a dollar in this area.
7 posted on
02/13/2008 7:19:43 PM PST by
rabscuttle385
(Admin Moderator for President. No amnesty for the establishment—Republican and Democrat!)
To: Lorianne
1) Thank you USA, for buying all these goods from all these poor countries.
2) Curse the USA for buying all these goods from all these poor countries allowing the workers to join the middle class and giving them the opportunity to buy scooters, cars, refrigerators, TVs, computers,....
3) LATimes goes bankrupt, and all its employees join the rank of poor. Thank you US readers for.....
12 posted on
02/13/2008 7:26:55 PM PST by
Chgogal
(When you vote Democrat, you vote Al Qaeda! Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother was agent to Moore's F9/11.)
To: Lorianne
So let me get this straight. The ability to afford to purchase food instead of begging or being fed by others is a bad thing?
14 posted on
02/13/2008 7:29:34 PM PST by
Woodman
("One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." PW)
To: Lorianne
16 posted on
02/13/2008 7:31:28 PM PST by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: Lorianne
Argentina, China, Egypt, Venezuela and Russia are among the nations that have imposed controls on food prices in an attempt to contain a public backlash.Good luck bringing half your population into the middle class with that kind of economic policy.
To: Lorianne
I wonder why you posted this article.
18 posted on
02/13/2008 7:32:47 PM PST by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: Lorianne
If we win The War, the world will be a much brighter place. If we don’t it will be the opposite.
19 posted on
02/13/2008 7:32:56 PM PST by
onedoug
To: Lorianne
This sounds like the Democrats of a 150 years ago...
"We need our slaves."
20 posted on
02/13/2008 7:35:19 PM PST by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
To: Lorianne
I wonder why you posted this article.
23 posted on
02/13/2008 7:36:33 PM PST by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: Lorianne
Can the world afford a growing middle class?
What a stupid question. We cannot afford to not have a growing middle class.
Mel
24 posted on
02/13/2008 7:42:56 PM PST by
melsec
(A Proud Aussie)
To: Lorianne
"placing greater demand on food supplies and natural resources"
And all this time I thought ethanol was the culprit.
32 posted on
02/13/2008 8:56:50 PM PST by
jwalburg
(Gullible warming protesters are self-extinguishing)
To: Lorianne
They neglect to mention that as the middle class grows, birth rates drop.
33 posted on
02/13/2008 9:00:30 PM PST by
jmyrlefuller
(The future of the United States of America is in our hands. Do not abuse it.)
To: Lorianne
Can the world afford a growing middle class? Considering that by 2030, China's CO2 emissions may equal that of the entire world today I would say that the answer is a big no.
To: Lorianne
Bring back communism! That’ll stop all this prosperity!
37 posted on
02/13/2008 10:38:59 PM PST by
Eleutheria5
(http://www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html or try http://astore.amazon.com/bemasnebo-20)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson