When you are trying to make a point, does it bother you to just make something up so you can have a response? I never said “it is certain we have a problem.” My point has been that there is enough evidence to cause me serious concern. I posted an article which appears to evisorate your singular argument. At a minimum, there is enough in the article for me to keep an open mind. The fact that scientists are still trying to sort out the impact of water as a GHG and as a potential feedback mechanism, while you cling to a 98% figure that most scientists reject—demonstrates you are a flat-earther. Your belief that any uncertainty is tantamount to all uncertainty, probably didn’t win you any science fairs or logic awards. Don’t worry, the world needs linear thinkers too.
OK, do you mind if I ask for evidence for your concern? (PC speak for emotional turmoil) I have read dozens of articles, both scientific and journalistic, about this issue and the idea that water vapor is the greatest, by far, GHG has not been rejected.
And I will put up my scientist/s (there were several contributors to my source) against your unidentified speculator. Speculation is not evisceration.
Marked, for detailed comments and corrections later.