Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reily
That's a major difference between Biblical accounts and Koranic acounts: the Biblical ones, for the most part, have at least some historic and archaeological corroboration, and the Koranic ones, not.
151 posted on 02/15/2008 3:45:41 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Ain't that the darndest thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
I am not claiming the Koranic account had any validity!
I don’t know how you can draw that conclusion.
I thought my statement was dripping with sarcasm about the lack of real historical understanding of Muzzies.
They literal believe that there is no history prior to Mad Moe!

There is an enormous amount of historical & literary evidence that the Koran is mish-mash of material from Gnostic, Judaic, Syrian-Christian & Arabic pre-Christian sources.

152 posted on 02/15/2008 4:11:24 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson