[Hacklehead]

Those numbers don’t add up. For Obama to have gained 20 points in the last month means he had to get all of the Edwards and Kucinich votes, and almost all of the newly decided. Hellary’s numbers are essentially flat.
The latest RCP polls taken in the last few days show Hellary up by double digits in TX, PA and OH.

[DJtex]

RCP is not a poll, but an average of a lot of polls. That's good in a way, but it does not reflect the present. Also, for some reason there have been no polls of Texas that I've seen for the last 3-4 weeks. That's why, the recent ARG poll is important, even though ARG is not the most respected group out there.

RCP won't show the trend for Obama, if there is one, for a couple of weeks yet. I agree that Hillary takes Ohio. But she's lost 8 primaries in a row, and lost 20 of the 28 states they've competed in. Don't count New Mexico, that took over two weeks to count their cauci.

I'm coming around to McCain, who is definitely a safer candidate than Obama or Billary. I'm crossing over in Texas to mess with their process, as they've messed with ours. I was going to vote for Obama--but now, I know I should boost Hillary to keep the fight going until the Dim' convention. But I just can't do that. Billary is evil, it's unnatural, a two-headed monster that will have their marraige dynamics played out on the world stage for four years.

Someone here said to watch McCain on Larry King last night so I tuned to a network that I've not watched since they started airing 'snuff films' of our guys in Iraq. McCain looked so much better than either Hillary or Obama. I think that we sweep the floor with either of the Dim' candidates this fall, so I'm pushing Obama in Texas to kill the Clinton's once and for all.

If Hillary runs but loses, she and Bill still control the party for four more years. She might even run again. If Billary, Inc. loses the nomination in a messy, convention floor fight, then their Party is through with them, and America is better off.