Roger Goodell is hiding something. This Walsh fellow better watch his back. Specter may have gotten involved because he felt his team was slighted, but with each rock he turns over, something slimy scampers out. The fine and punishment never made sense from day one. Now, I'm starting to see why.
1 posted on
02/15/2008 10:56:45 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: Hatteras
Why are senators getting involved in football?
Carolyn
2 posted on
02/15/2008 10:57:45 AM PST by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: Hatteras
Goodell v. Specter...
Pity they can’t both lose.
3 posted on
02/15/2008 10:57:57 AM PST by
Petronski
(I didn't leave the GOP. The GOP left me.)
To: Hatteras
" Specter said he was concerned to learn from Walsh's attorney that an NFL security representative, Dick Farley, had been investigating Walsh. Specter said: "I confronted them on that, and Goodell says, 'Yeah, he [Farley] works for us. Yeah, he is a security guy, but we didn't know he was investigating him.' "Sure, Roger.
7 posted on
02/15/2008 11:09:54 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: Hatteras
The future of our nation and culture, as well as the Republican party, hangs tenuously in the balance, and this clown is going on about foootball?
To: Hatteras
I forget, why is the US government involved in the NFL?
10 posted on
02/15/2008 11:22:57 AM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(" Nobody likes weepy meat." -- Mayor Quimby)
To: Hatteras
It seems Sen. Specter is jealous of Waxman over the baseball hearings and has decided to dabble in sports himself.
Congress makes me physically ill.
13 posted on
02/15/2008 11:24:39 AM PST by
TChris
("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
To: Hatteras
Maybe the Senate should have Goodell water boarded?
To: Hatteras
Specter’s single bullet explanation doesn’t pass scrutiny either.
To: Hatteras
WHAT DID THE BURGLAR DESTROY FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES????
16 posted on
02/15/2008 11:27:56 AM PST by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: Hatteras
Roger Goodell is hiding something.
Maybe, and I'm certainly no fan of Belichick or the Pats. But I can't think of a single good reason for a US senator to concern himself with this.
To: Hatteras
SPECTRE, you jackal!!!! Why aren’t you busy grilling the treasonous House leadership in the media over how they just left town to allow a critical anti-terrorist measure to expire tomorrow night??
Everyone should read Andy McCarthy’s great column today in Human Events, about how after 12 midnight on Sat. it will be much more difficult to monitor OVERSEAS terrorist communications — the losers in the House slipped out of town and didn’t pass a bill, but of course Arlen SPECTRE is infinitely more concerned about a sport than about American lives around the world.
20 posted on
02/15/2008 11:31:31 AM PST by
Enchante
(Hillary Clinton: Bring Back Maggie Williams, the Hero(ine) of FosterGate!!)
To: Hatteras
To all asking why Congress is involved with the NFL, they have every right to be under the commerce clause in the Constitution. I'm at work, on break right now, but will post more later. Suffice it to say for now that when the McLaren Formula 1 racing team was caught with information from rival team Ferrari, they were fined $100 million dollars and had all team points removed.
The Patriots penalty was no penalty at all; it was akin to fining me $2. Goodell destroyed the tapes and covered up. The NFL has anti-trust exemptions and functions as a cartel. That league needs an enema.
28 posted on
02/15/2008 11:55:11 AM PST by
Richard Kimball
(Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
To: Hatteras
Does Arlen Spector realize what an ass he is? I guess not.....
39 posted on
02/15/2008 12:26:31 PM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Hatteras
Nah, Specter is getting involved because he doesn’t want the Democrats to take all the blame for interfering in sports management. Specter just wants the Republicans to look as foolish and the Democrats.
49 posted on
02/15/2008 12:41:52 PM PST by
Eva
(Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
To: Hatteras
Improper allocation of governmental resources, a reach outside of the charter granted Congress by the People.
56 posted on
02/15/2008 1:22:07 PM PST by
bvw
To: Hatteras
we have judges who think ‘judicial independence’ means they can legislate
and legislators like specter who think they can assume the role of the courts
if ‘spygate’ is a legal issue it is a legal issue for the teams, the league and, if truly needed, duly appointed prosecutors of the executive - not our senators
it must be a slow-media season for specter
57 posted on
02/15/2008 1:46:49 PM PST by
Wuli
To: Hatteras
Specter’s magic bullet doesn’t pass scrutiny either. Let’s call it a draw and move on.
61 posted on
02/15/2008 2:10:59 PM PST by
sono
(You fight campaigns with the politicians you have.)
To: Hatteras
What is this fascination of our Congress with sports anyway? But that there were equal oversight on Congress. Specter and Leahy and the rest of them are pathetic jerks.
62 posted on
02/15/2008 2:14:07 PM PST by
EDINVA
To: Hatteras
We’ll all remember exactly where we were when we first heard the news.
64 posted on
02/15/2008 2:25:55 PM PST by
Lost Highway
(I don't know what the world may need but a V8 engines a good start for me)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson